Help
Options
Didn't know it?
click below
click below
Knew it?
click below
click below
Don't Know
Remaining cards (0)
Know
retry
shuffle
restart
0:00
Embed Code - If you would like this activity on your web page, copy the script below and paste it into your web page.
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Criminal Law Exam 2
Criminal Law Exam Review Questions 2
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| Explain "inchoate crimes." | Crimes that were begun but not completed, such as conspiracy or attempt. |
| What is the "Castle Doctrine"? | A legal doctrine that allows individuals to use reasonable force, including deadly force, to protect themselves in their home. |
| How would the application of the "reasonable person standard" differ in cases of self-defense versus negligence? Discuss the implications for the defendant. | Self-defense assesses threat perception, while negligence focuses on duty to act. This impacts liability significantly. |
| Consider a case where a defendant pleads insanity. What factors should the court consider to ensure a fair judgment? | Courts should evaluate mental state and illness severity, balancing rights and public safety. |
| Analyze the "felony murder rule" in relation to proportionality in sentencing. Is this rule fair? | Often seen as unfair; it imposes harsh sentences regardless of intent, disrupting proportionality. |
| If a defendant commits a crime under extreme duress, how should this affect culpability? | It may reduce culpability but varies by case, leading to inconsistent applications. |
| How do cultural differences influence interpretations of "reasonable" behavior in legal contexts? | Cultural norms shape perceptions, affecting self-defense and consent definitions. |
| Evaluate the effectiveness of the "three strikes law." Contributes to crime reduction or overpopulation? | Evidence suggests minimal crime reduction and increased prison overpopulation. |
| How can "strict liability" serve public safety yet lead to injustice? | It ensures accountability but may punish individuals without intent, like a chef for contaminated food. |
| How do mitigating factors affect justice in sentencing? | They personalize justice but can disrupt uniformity across sentences. |
| What role does the media play in shaping perceptions of criminal cases? | Media influences bias; ethical reporting should ensure accurate, fair coverage. |
| How might plea bargaining undermine the integrity of the justice system? | It may coerce innocent pleas; alternatives include restorative justice focus and comprehensive trials. |
| How should socioeconomic factors influence criminal justice policies? | Policies should address root causes like poverty, not just punitive measures. |
| How have advancements in technology changed criminal law? | Technology, like DNA, improves accuracy but raises privacy and wrongful conviction concerns. |
| Discuss the "war on drugs" impact on sentencing disparities. | It leads to disproportionate sentences; reforms could include decriminalization and fair guidelines. |
| Assess rehabilitation programs' effectiveness in the justice system. | Success depends on meeting individual needs; integration should include thorough assessments. |
| How do cultural responses to crime differ internationally? | Responses vary widely; some prioritize rehabilitation over punishment, complicating universal standards. |
| Evaluate police discretion in law enforcement. | It allows flexibility but risks bias; clear guidelines and oversight are needed. |
| How does "equal protection under the law" challenge inequalities in the justice system? | Systemic bias undermines this principle; reforms should focus on equity and accountability. |
| What are the benefits and downsides of restorative justice? | It promotes healing but may lack effectiveness for serious crimes. |
Created by:
KalanR
Popular Criminal Justice sets