click below
click below
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Criminal Law
chapters 6-9
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| Idea that competent adults voluntarily consented to crimes against themselves and knew what they were consenting to. | defense of consent |
| consent was the product of free will, not of force, threat of force, or trickery. | voluntary consent |
| the person consenting understands what she's consenting to; she's not too young or insane to understand. | knowing consent |
| the person consenting has the authority to give consent. | authorized consent |
| State v. Shelley (1997) | Jason Shelley was convicted of second degree assault, arising out of an incident in which Shelley intentionally punched another basketball player during a game. |
| the insanity defense is overused? | less than 1 percent (0.87%) of defendants plead inanity, and a mere 23.55 percent of those who plead, succeed. |
| There's no risk to the defendant who pleads insanity. | Defendants who asserted an insanity defense at trial and who were ultimately found guilty of their charges, served significantly longer sentences than defendants tried on similar charges. |
| insanity | the legal term that refers to a mental disease or defect that impairs the reason and/ or will to control action. |
| civil commitment | a noncriminal (civil) proceeding in which courts have the power to decide if defendants who were insane when they committed their comes are still insane. |
| proving insanity | when the crime was committed (sanity). When the defendant is charged and tried (competency). |
| complicity | establishes when you can be criminals liable for someone else conduct; applies criminal liability to accomplices and accessories. |