Save
Busy. Please wait.
Log in with Clever
or

show password
Forgot Password?

Don't have an account?  Sign up 
Sign up using Clever
or

Username is available taken
show password


Make sure to remember your password. If you forget it there is no way for StudyStack to send you a reset link. You would need to create a new account.
Your email address is only used to allow you to reset your password. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.


Already a StudyStack user? Log In

Reset Password
Enter the associated with your account, and we'll email you a link to reset your password.
focusNode
Didn't know it?
click below
 
Knew it?
click below
Don't Know
Remaining cards (0)
Know
0:00
Embed Code - If you would like this activity on your web page, copy the script below and paste it into your web page.

  Normal Size     Small Size show me how

Criminal Law

chapters 6-9

QuestionAnswer
Idea that competent adults voluntarily consented to crimes against themselves and knew what they were consenting to. defense of consent
consent was the product of free will, not of force, threat of force, or trickery. voluntary consent
the person consenting understands what she's consenting to; she's not too young or insane to understand. knowing consent
the person consenting has the authority to give consent. authorized consent
State v. Shelley (1997) Jason Shelley was convicted of second degree assault, arising out of an incident in which Shelley intentionally punched another basketball player during a game.
the insanity defense is overused? less than 1 percent (0.87%) of defendants plead inanity, and a mere 23.55 percent of those who plead, succeed.
There's no risk to the defendant who pleads insanity. Defendants who asserted an insanity defense at trial and who were ultimately found guilty of their charges, served significantly longer sentences than defendants tried on similar charges.
insanity the legal term that refers to a mental disease or defect that impairs the reason and/ or will to control action.
civil commitment a noncriminal (civil) proceeding in which courts have the power to decide if defendants who were insane when they committed their comes are still insane.
proving insanity when the crime was committed (sanity). When the defendant is charged and tried (competency).
complicity establishes when you can be criminals liable for someone else conduct; applies criminal liability to accomplices and accessories.
Created by: rudy.d.84
Popular Criminal Justice sets

 

 



Voices

Use these flashcards to help memorize information. Look at the large card and try to recall what is on the other side. Then click the card to flip it. If you knew the answer, click the green Know box. Otherwise, click the red Don't know box.

When you've placed seven or more cards in the Don't know box, click "retry" to try those cards again.

If you've accidentally put the card in the wrong box, just click on the card to take it out of the box.

You can also use your keyboard to move the cards as follows:

If you are logged in to your account, this website will remember which cards you know and don't know so that they are in the same box the next time you log in.

When you need a break, try one of the other activities listed below the flashcards like Matching, Snowman, or Hungry Bug. Although it may feel like you're playing a game, your brain is still making more connections with the information to help you out.

To see how well you know the information, try the Quiz or Test activity.

Pass complete!
"Know" box contains:
Time elapsed:
Retries:
restart all cards