click below
click below
Normal Size Small Size show me how
hosa biomed prac 1
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| 1. According to the “Helpful or harmful?” study, which group did the authors interview to understand SMI-driven communication? | Health expert content creators (HECCs) |
| 2. What benefit did HECCs identify about SMIs? | Promoting positive health behaviors |
| 3. What concern did HECCs raise about non-expert SMIs? | Oversimplified or inaccurate health messages |
| 4. How many adolescents were surveyed in Sercu (2024)? | 509 |
| 5. What two literacies were measured in Sercu (2024)? | Food literacy and health literacy |
| 6. What was the primary finding regarding SMI use and literacy levels? | More frequent SMI use correlated with better health and food literacy |
| 7. Besides misinformation, what other issue was highlighted about SMI health messaging? | Overgeneralized health messaging |
| 8. Which behavior/outcome was NOT influenced by SMIs? | Genetic engineering decisions |
| 9. How many articles were in the adolescents’ health scoping review? | 51 |
| 10. Which health topics were most commonly discussed by SMIs? | Nutrition, appearance, and substance use |
| 11. What concern did the scoping review raise about SMI posts? | They promoted unrealistic body images and unhealthy diets |
| 12. What topic was underrepresented among SMI health posts? | Mental and sexual health |
| 13. What major challenge does SMI presence pose for adolescent health? | Inconsistent definitions/classifications of SMIs |
| 14. According to Vassallo et al. (2021), how does social media challenge chronic disease prevention? | Spreading misinformation |
| 15. What benefit does social media offer to public health? | Reaching large audiences for health promotion |
| 16. Why might HECCs engage in social media communication? | To counteract misleading health messages |
| 17. What instrument measured health literacy in Sercu (2024)? | MOHLAA-Q |
| 18. What instrument measured food literacy in Sercu (2024)? | SFLQ |
| 19. What implication did Sercu (2024) suggest? | Use influencers’ channels to promote health literacy |
| 20. What should future research address according to “Helpful or harmful?” | Both misinformation and overgeneralized messaging |
| 21. How many articles came from non-Global North countries? | Very few |
| 22. What is a risk of SMI-driven health advice? | Promotion of harmful behaviors |
| 23. True or False: Sercu found SMIs always cause worse outcomes. | False |
| 24. Why is social media a “dual-nature” public health tool? | It spreads both accurate and misleading information |
| 25. Conclusion of “Helpful or harmful?” about SMIs? | They have both benefits and risks |
| 26. What type of SMI health content was understudied? | Mental and sexual health |
| 27. What method was used in “Helpful or harmful?”? | Thematic qualitative text analysis |
| 28. How is health literacy defined in Sercu (2024)? | Skills to understand, use, and evaluate health information |
| 29. What is food literacy in Sercu (2024)? | Knowledge, attitudes, and skills to maintain a healthy diet |
| 30. Why are SMIs appealing as health info sources for adolescents? | Content on appearance, diet, and lifestyle |
| 37. What made certain non-expert influencers appealing despite lacking expertise? | Relatable personal narratives and authenticity |
| 38. Adolescents heavily influenced by SMIs tend to: | Show greater engagement with nutrition and health topics |
| 39. Public health campaigns using influencers are most effective when: | Influencers have high trust and perceived authenticity |
| 40. What key element was missing in many SMI-driven interventions? | Long-term outcome measurement |
| 41. Which platform was most associated with appearance-based content? | TikTok/Instagram |
| 42. What challenge did HECCs face when promoting accurate info? | Their content was less engaging than non-expert influencers |
| 43. What demographic factor influenced adolescents’ interaction with SMI health content? | Parent educational level |
| 44. Why does misinformation spread fast? | Expert content tends to be less sensational |
| 45. When are SMI-led health interventions most effective? | When the influencer has subject-matter expertise |
| 46. What ethical concern did HECCs raise about non-expert SMIs? | Exploiting followers’ fears or insecurities |
| 47. Higher food literacy was associated with what? | More critical evaluation of online dietary advice |
| 48. Key driver of adolescents’ trust in SMIs? | Authenticity and relatability |
| 49. What improvement is needed for public health messaging online? | More emotionally resonant messages like influencer style |
| 50. Overall conclusion across all articles? | SMIs can both help and harm public health depending on expertise, content, literacy, and intent |