Help
Options
Didn't know it?
click below
click below
Knew it?
click below
click below
Don't Know
Remaining cards (0)
Know
retry
shuffle
restart
0:00
Embed Code - If you would like this activity on your web page, copy the script below and paste it into your web page.
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Normal Size Small Size show me how
APGovSCCasesTri1
Trimester One Supreme Court Cases for AP Gov/Politics
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| Barron v Baltimore | 5th Amendment does NOT apply to states |
| McCulloch v Maryland | Established Supremacy Clause and Necessary and Proper Clause |
| Marbury v Madison | Establishes Supreme Court's power |
| Gibbons v Ogden | Establishes interstate commerce clause |
| US v Lopez | Limits the commerce clause and declares Gun-Free School Zones Act unconstitutional |
| Fletcher v Peck | Annuling contracts made by previous legistlative acts is okay |
| South Dakota v Dole | It is okay to keep funding from states that do not meet certain requirements |
| Gideon v Wainwright | Sixth amendment applies to state cases as well as federal cases |
| Gitlow v New York | First amendment rights do not include anything that may provoke a violent response. |
| Palko v Connecticut | Protection against double jeopardy was not a fundamental right |
| DC v Heller | Right to own guns, even in DC, is protected by the 2nd amendment |
| Pollock v Farmers Loan and Trust | Imposing taxes based on personal income is unconstitutional (negated with passing of 16th amendment) |
| Printz v US | Background checks on gun owners are unconstitutional |
| Schenck v US | First amendment does not protect attempts to obstruct recruitment of the army |
| Worcester (Cherokee Nation) v Georgia | Georgia cannot regulate trade between Indian tribes, as that is a right reserved to the federal government |
| US Term Limits v Thornton | Changing requirements for Congress is unconstitutional |
| Cedar Rapids v Garret | States must provide one on one care for disabled students |
| Baker v Carr | Federal courts can hear a constitutional challenge to a legislative apportionment |
| Clinton v New York | Line item vetoes unconstitutional |
| Dred Scott v Sandford | No one but a citizen of the United States could be a citizen of a state. |
| Goss v Lopez | Students cannot be suspended without a hearing |
| Reynolds v US | Polygamy is not okay, even if it is for religious practices |
| New Jersey v TLO | Students may be searched with probable cause or reasonable suspicion |
| Oregon v Smith | Freedom of religion does not protect illegal acts, such as the using of drugs |
| Tinker v DesMoines | Rights do not end at schoolhouse gate; students may wear anti-Vietnam bands |
Created by:
onekasaur
Popular American Government sets