Help
Options
Didn't know it?
click below
click below
Knew it?
click below
click below
Don't Know
Remaining cards (0)
Know
retry
shuffle
restart
0:00
Embed Code - If you would like this activity on your web page, copy the script below and paste it into your web page.
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Normal Size Small Size show me how
ap gov court cases
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| schenck v. us | clear and present danger clause |
| gitlow v ny | bad tendency doctrine-speech w tendency to lead to illegal action restricted |
| tinker v. desmoines | vietnam armbands |
| bethel school district v. fraser | suspend students for lewd speech |
| hustler magazine v. falwell | intentional infliction of emotional distress allowable |
| texas v. johnson | flag burning |
| morse v. frederick | bong hits 4 jesus |
| miller v. ca | 3 part obscenity test |
| near v. mn | selectively incorporates freedom of press |
| ny times v. sullivan | publish false article they thought was true, not libel |
| ny times v. us | pentagon papers |
| hazelwood school v. kuhlmeier | regulate student newspapers |
| thornhill v al | strikes by unions lawful |
| cox v nh | parade permits |
| lloyd corp v. tanner | protesters have less rights in private spaces, like malls |
| boy scouts v. dale | private organizations have rt to choose membership, even based on sexuality |
| engel v. vitale | prohibited prayer in public schools |
| abington school district v. schempp | no reading of bible in public schools |
| epperson v ak | no ban of evolution |
| lemon v kurtzman | money rules for giving to religious schools: secular purpose, promote nor inhibit, excessive entanglement |
| wi v. yoder | amish parents can remove kids from school before 16 for relious reasons |
| employment division v. smith | can deny unemployment to person fired for violating prohibition of use of peyote |
| weeks v us | exclusionary rule |
| powell v al | st must provide lawyers in death penalty cases |
| betts v. brady | st doesn't have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases |
| mapp v oh | extended exclusionary rule to sts |
| gideon v. wainwright | all sts must provide attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one |
| escobedo v il | must grant lawyer to those who ask for one or confession doesn't count |
| miranda v az | must be informed of rights before arrest |
| furman v ga | stop death penalty until better method of sentencing derived |
| woodson v nc | nc attempt to resolve death penalty issue, court rejected it |
| gregg v ga | death penalty no cruel and unusual punishment |
| atkins v va | no execution of mentally challenged |
| griswold v ct | right to privacy |
| roe v wade | national abortion guidelines |
| webster v reproductive health services | sts more power to regulate abortion |
| planned parenthood v casey | no husband consent; parental consent and 24 hr wait upheld |
| lawrence v tx | no sodamy law; overruled bowers v hardwick |
| plessy v ferguson | separate but equal |
| brown v board of edu of topeka | unanimous, separate but equal is unconstitutional |
| brown v board 2nd | schools desegregate w deliberate speed |
| heart of atl motel inc v us | civil rights act of 1964 mandated hotels can't discriminate |
| katzenback v mcclurg | power of congress to regulate interstate commerce extends to st discrimination statutes |
| regents of u of ca v bakke | quotas requiring certain percentage of minorites violate 14th |
| grutter v bollinger | u of m law school and u of m |
| marbury v madison | judicial review |
| sd v dole | mandated 21 yr old drinking age |
| us v lopez | commerce clause doesn't give congress power to regulate guns near schools |
| korematsu v us | japanese ams could be interned |
| us v nixon | no such thing as executive privelege in criminal cases |
| clinton v ny | no presidential use of line item veto |
| barron v baltimore | bill of rights restricts federal not st gvnts |
| brandenburg v oh | kkk speech, can't be jailed unless speech led to imminent lawless action |
| chaplinsky v nh | fighting words could be prohibited |
| dejonge v oregon | peaceable assembly for lawful discussion can't be a crime |
| dennis v us | gvnt can limit speech even if it didn't lead to action |
| katz v us | wiretaps illegal w/o warrant |
| olmstead v us | unlimited phone tapping |
| or v elstad | confessions given before rights are read are admissible in court |
| va v black | cross burning is fighting words and illegal |
| rostker v goldberg | congress can draft men, not women |
Created by:
arpatrick
Popular American Government sets