Save
Busy. Please wait.
Log in with Clever
or

show password
Forgot Password?

Don't have an account?  Sign up 
Sign up using Clever
or

Username is available taken
show password


Make sure to remember your password. If you forget it there is no way for StudyStack to send you a reset link. You would need to create a new account.
Your email address is only used to allow you to reset your password. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.


Already a StudyStack user? Log In

Reset Password
Enter the associated with your account, and we'll email you a link to reset your password.
focusNode
Didn't know it?
click below
 
Knew it?
click below
Don't Know
Remaining cards (0)
Know
0:00
Embed Code - If you would like this activity on your web page, copy the script below and paste it into your web page.

  Normal Size     Small Size show me how

Landmark SC Cases 1

Landmark SC Cases

QuestionAnswer
Weeks v. US Established exclusionary rule, evidence gotten without a warrant isn't admissible in a federal court; 4th Amendment
Schenck v. United States 1919--Case involving limits on free speech. Established the "clear and present danger" principle.
Gitlow v. New York (1925) Established precedent of federalizing Bill of Rights (applying them to the states); states cannot deny freedom of speech --protected through due process clause of Amendment 14; speech can be limited if it promotes a dangerous tendency
Near v. Minnesota the 1931 Supreme Court decision holding that the first amendment protects newspapers from prior restraint. Speech in print cannot be limited before it is printed.
Mapp v. Ohio (1961) Extended the Exclusionary Rule (evidence obtained by searches and seizures in violation of the Fourth Amendment) to states by using the due process clause of the 14th Amendment.
Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) Ordered states to provide lawyers for those unable to afford them in criminal proceedings. Used equal Protection clause of the 14th Amendment to apply 6th Amendment right to free counsel for those unable to afford to hire a lawyer.
Miranda v. Arizona (1966) requires government agents to warn suspects of their right to remain silent and/or contact an attorney before questioning them when they are in custody. Statements made without Miranda Warning are inadmissible in court
Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971) Established 3-part test to determine if establishment clause is violated: non-secular purpose, advances/inhibits religion, excessive entanglement with government.
Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier (1988) schools have the right to refuse speech that is inconsistent with 'the shared values of community standards, so long as their actions are "reasonably related to legitimate pedagogical concerns."
Hustler v. Falwell (1988) The First Amendment prohibits public figures from recovering damages for intentional infliction of emotional harm unless the publication contained a false statement made with actual malice.
Texas v. Johnson (1989) Flag-burning is symbolic speech with a political purpose and is protected by 1st Amendment.
DC v. Heller (2008) upheld individual's right to bear arms. handguns, an entire class of arms that is commonly used for protection purposes, and prohibiting firearms from being kept functional in the home, the area traditionally in need of protection, violates the 2nd Amend.
Barron v. Baltimore (1833) S C ruled that the due process clause of the 5th Amend did not apply to the actions of states. This limited the Bill of Rights to the actions of Congress. This is later be overturned when the SC began applying the B of R to states through the 14th Amend.
Engel v. Vitale 1962 prayer cannot be led, required, composed or be made compulsory by school personnel.
Pennsylvania V. Schempp Supreme Court decided that reading scripture was just as unconstitutional as prayer in school.
The Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye v. Florida the justices concluded that governments that permit other forms of killing animals may not then ban sacrifices or ritual killings and found no compelling state interest that justified the abridgment of the freedom of religion,
McDonald v. Chacago 2010 Arguing whether the 2nd Amend applied to state gun laws. SC decided that yes the 2nd Amend applies to state and local governments as well as federal.
Furman V. Georgia 1972 SC found Georgia's death penalty freakish and random therefore in violation of curel and unusual punishment of the 8th Amendment
Created by: Mrs. Kaminski
Popular American Government sets

 

 



Voices

Use these flashcards to help memorize information. Look at the large card and try to recall what is on the other side. Then click the card to flip it. If you knew the answer, click the green Know box. Otherwise, click the red Don't know box.

When you've placed seven or more cards in the Don't know box, click "retry" to try those cards again.

If you've accidentally put the card in the wrong box, just click on the card to take it out of the box.

You can also use your keyboard to move the cards as follows:

If you are logged in to your account, this website will remember which cards you know and don't know so that they are in the same box the next time you log in.

When you need a break, try one of the other activities listed below the flashcards like Matching, Snowman, or Hungry Bug. Although it may feel like you're playing a game, your brain is still making more connections with the information to help you out.

To see how well you know the information, try the Quiz or Test activity.

Pass complete!
"Know" box contains:
Time elapsed:
Retries:
restart all cards