click below
click below
Normal Size Small Size show me how
COM 131 Fallacies
COM 131 Review
Question | Answer |
---|---|
Labeling people or ideas with words or bad connotation. | Name Calling |
Good words that want people to accept and agree with ideas without examining evidence | Glittering Generalities |
Trys to win confidence and support by appearing to be a person like ourselves. | Plain Folks Appeal |
Only telling the people what they want to hear. | Argumentum Ad Populum |
Attacking the speaker, not the subject. | Argumentum Ad Hominem |
Urges to support an action or opinion only because it's popular. | Bandwagon |
Sets up a cause and effect relationship that may not be true. | Faulty cause and effect |
Comparisons between analogies that have no connection and nothing in common. | False Analogy |
Believing there is a simple yes or no answer to a complex problem. | Two Extremes |
Selecting only facts that support the speakers point of view, ignoring all others | Card Stacking |
Testimonial possibly by a non-expert. | Testimonial |
An argument that relies on irrelevant premises for its conclusion. | Red Herring |
A faulty assumption that leads to a series of unwanted events. | Slippery Slope |
An argument supporting a claim because it has always been done that way. | Appeal to Tradition |
An argument in which the conclusion is not connected to the reasoning. | Non Sequitur |
An argument in which and isolated instance is used to make an unwarranted general conclusion. | Hasty Generalization |
An argument that is stated in such a way that it has to be true, even without evidence. | Begging The Question |
An argument stated in only two alternatives, though more may exist. | Either-Or Fallacy |