click below
click below
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Causes of War and Pe
Question | Answer |
---|---|
o Number of seats directly proportional to number of votes o Diverse opinions but coalition government o Incentive for extreme parties and/votes based on ethnicity | • Proportional Representation (PR) |
o One person in district, most votes = win o Creates two extreme parties o Inadvertently locks out minority votes | • Single-Member District Plurality (SMDP) |
o Concept about SMDP States that it leads to a radical two-party system | • Duverger’s Law |
o Protects minority groups with rights o Group representation | • Consociationalism |
o National government is dominant (centralized power) o Example is the UK | • Unitary System |
o Power is shared among central power and political subunits such as regional states | • Federal |
o Regional government more powerful than national government | • Confederal |
o President oversees the legislature o More prone to dictatorship | • Presidential System |
o Intertwined legislative and executive branch o Things get done faster, quicker decisions o Prime Ministers are heads of Parliament o Higher levels of voter turnout | • Parliamentary System |
o Fusion of Parliament and Presidential o President and Prime Minister both under day-to-day aministration o Example is France and Russia | • Semi-Presidential System (Mixed Republic) |
o Generally a military government running the system o Small group of decision makers o Highly centralized o Example is Chile | • Authoritarianism |
o Conflict that was never really resolved with low levels of violence o Primarily found in post-Soviet states | • Frozen Conflict |
o Help create protection screws and roaming banditry o Produce the danger and the protection simultaneously o Make war profitable | • Ethnic Entrepreneurs |
o Concept of kinship o Members share language, blood, thought, etc o Seen in Rwanda genocide causing cultural gap o Leads to violence due to rivalries among ethnic groups | • Ancient Hatreds (aka Primordialism) |
o Separation of ethinicities living in different areas o More dangerous when intermixed | • Dual Societies |
o Protection service to be stationary o As cost of robberies go up, cost for protection increases o Mercenaries and private security firms o Violent Entrepreneaurs o Leads to plundering within state, especially Africa | • Protection Screw |
o Form where newly elected leaders give jobs to people who helped them get into office o Leads to corruption | • Spoils Politics |
o Theory where countries with more abundant natural resources, especially fuels have a less economic growth and worse outcomes than countries with less abundance o Hurts development due to exploitation issues and increased dependency o Water, crops, oil | • Resource Curse |
o Maintaining the peace | • Peacekeeping |
o Resolving conflict through the use of violence o NATO | • Peacemaking |
o Scenario where win is automatic loss/expense for another party or all parties | • Zero-sum Game |
o Scenario where everyone wins o Nobody wins at someone else’s expense | • Positive-sum Game |
o What in God’s good name is the significance of a national security doctrine for this class? o Probably something to do with Latin American countries | • National Security Doctrine (NSD) |