Save
Busy. Please wait.
Log in with Clever
or

show password
Forgot Password?

Don't have an account?  Sign up 
Sign up using Clever
or

Username is available taken
show password


Make sure to remember your password. If you forget it there is no way for StudyStack to send you a reset link. You would need to create a new account.
Your email address is only used to allow you to reset your password. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.


Already a StudyStack user? Log In

Reset Password
Enter the associated with your account, and we'll email you a link to reset your password.
focusNode
Didn't know it?
click below
 
Knew it?
click below
Don't Know
Remaining cards (0)
Know
0:00
Embed Code - If you would like this activity on your web page, copy the script below and paste it into your web page.

  Normal Size     Small Size show me how

Key Court Cases

QuestionAnswer
Marbury v. Madison (1803) Established judicial review; “midnight judges;” John Marshall; power of the Supreme Court.
McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) Established national supremacy; established implied powers; use of elastic clause; state unable to tax fed. Institution; John Marshall; “the power to tax involves the power to destroy.”
Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) Established separate but equal.
Schenck V. U.S. (1919) Oliver Wendell Holmes; clear and present danger test; shouting “fire” in a crowded theater; limits on speech, esp. in wartime.
Gitlow v. New York (1925) Established precedent of federalizing Bill of Rights (applying them to the states); states cannot deny freedom of speech -–protected through due process clause of Amendment 14
Palko v. Connecticut (1937) Provided test for determining which parts of Bill of Rights should be federalized – those which are implicitly or explicitly necessary for liberty to exist.
Brown v. Board, 1st (1954) School segregation unconstitutional; segregation psychologically damaging to blacks; overturned separate but equal; use of 14th Amendment; judicial activism of Warren Court; unanimous decision.
Brown v. Board, 2nd (1955) Ordered schools to desegregate “with all due and deliberate speed.”
Mapp v. Ohio (1961) Established exclusionary rule; illegally obtained evidence cannot be used in court; Warren Court’s judicial activism
Engel v. Vitale (1962) Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools by virtue of Amendment One’s establishment clause and the 14th Amendment’s due process clause; Warren Court’s judicial activism.
Baker v. Carr (1962) “One man, one vote.” Ordered state legislative districts to be as near equal as possible in population; Warren Court’s political judicial activism.
Abbington v. Schempp (1963) Prohibited devotional Bible reading in public schools by virtue of establishment clause and due process clause. Warren Court’s judicial activism.
Gideon v. Wainright (1963) Ordered states to provide lawyers for those unable to afford them in criminal proceedings. Warren Court’s judicial activism in criminal rights.
Wesberry v. Sanders (1963) Ordered House districts to be as near equal in population as possible.
Griswald v. Connecticut (1965) Established right of privacy through 4th and 9th Amendments. Set a precedent for Roe v. Wade.
Miranda v. Arizona (1966) Established Miranda warnings of counsel and silence. Must be given before questioning. Warren Court’s judicial activism in criminal rights.
Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971) Allowed states to provide textbooks and busing to students attending private religious schools. Established 3-part test to determine if establishment clause is violated: nonsecular purpose, advances/inhibits religion, more entanglement with government.
Roe v. Wade (1973) Established national abortion guidelines; trimester guidelines: no state interference in 1st, state may protect health of mother in 2nd, state may regulate to protect health of unborn child in 3rd. Inferred from right of privacy est. in Griswald v. Conn.
U.S. v. Nixon (1974) Allowed for executive privilege, but not in criminal cases; “Even the President is not above the law;” Watergate.
Buckley v. Valeo (1976) 1st Amendment protects campaign spending; legislatures can limit contributions, but not how much one spends of his own money on campaigns.
U.C. Regents v. Bakke (1978) Alan Bakke and UC Davis Medical School; strict quotas unconst., but states may allow race to be taken into account as ONE factor in admissions decisions. Bakke admitted.
Webster v. Reproductive Health Services (1987) More leeway for states in regulating abortion, though no overturning of Roe v. Wade.
Texas v. Johnson (1989) Struck down Texas law that banned flag burning, which is a protected form of symbolic speech.
Employment Division of Oregon v. Smith (1990) States could deny unemployment benefits to a person fired for violating a state prohibition on the use of peyote even though the use of the drug was part of a religious ritual.
Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992) States can regulate abortion, but not with regulations that impose “undue burden” upon women; did not overturn Roe v. Wade, but gave states more leeway in regulating abortion (e.g., 24-hour waiting period, parental consent for minors)
Shaw v. Reno (1993) No racial gerrymandering; race cannot be the sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative boundaries; majority-minority districts.
U.S. v. Lopez (1995) Gun Free School Zones Act exceeded Congress’ authority to regulate interstate commerce.
Clinton v. NY (1998) Banned presidential use of line item veto
Bush v. Gore (2000) Use of 14th Amendment’s equal protection clause to stop the Florida recount in the election of 2000.
Zelman v. Simmons-Harris (02) Public money can be used to send disadvantaged children to religious schools in tuition voucher programs.
Ashcroft v. ACLU (2002) Struck down a federal ban on “virtual” child pornography
Lawrence v. Texas (2003) Using right of privacy, struck down Texas law banning sodomy.
Gratz v. Bollinger (2003) Struck down use of “bonus points” for race in undergrad admissions at University of Michigan.
Grutter v. Bollinger (2003) Allowed the use of race as a general factor in law school admissions at University of Michigan.
Kelo v. City of New London (’05) Eminent domain case: Local governments may force the sale of private property and make way for private economic development when officials decide it would benefit the public.
Gonzales v. Carhart (2007) Upheld Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003.
DC v. Heller (2008) Struck down a Washington DC ordinance that banned handguns
Created by: mrcoia
Popular American Government sets

 

 



Voices

Use these flashcards to help memorize information. Look at the large card and try to recall what is on the other side. Then click the card to flip it. If you knew the answer, click the green Know box. Otherwise, click the red Don't know box.

When you've placed seven or more cards in the Don't know box, click "retry" to try those cards again.

If you've accidentally put the card in the wrong box, just click on the card to take it out of the box.

You can also use your keyboard to move the cards as follows:

If you are logged in to your account, this website will remember which cards you know and don't know so that they are in the same box the next time you log in.

When you need a break, try one of the other activities listed below the flashcards like Matching, Snowman, or Hungry Bug. Although it may feel like you're playing a game, your brain is still making more connections with the information to help you out.

To see how well you know the information, try the Quiz or Test activity.

Pass complete!
"Know" box contains:
Time elapsed:
Retries:
restart all cards