click below
click below
Normal Size Small Size show me how
IRB/Belmont Report
Political Psychology Final
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| Nazi Experiments - Josef Mengele | in jew camp had goals with test improve survival of german troops(someone can be underwater), test medical procedures and drugs, confirm Nazi racial ideology (twins and huntchbacks) NO SAFEGUARDS |
| Hypothermia experiments | see how long people could survive (improve survival of german troops) |
| Genetic Studies | studies on twins and dwarfs medical “research” into illness, human endurance and more |
| Tools used and safegaurds | No anesthesia use, no safegaurds, lack of constent |
| lack of beneificence | experimenter doesnt care about safety of subjects |
| Nuremberg code: established for researchers: | informed consent, cannot force someone, need to have choice, beneficence of researcher (do no harm) |
| Milenburg experiment (wrongs about it) | giving someone okay to do something against their moral code just because an authority figure tells you to do it no informed consent what right does a researcher have to cause mental anguish and probably trauma continue shock as a teacher, screaming |
| Tuskegee Syphilis Study 1932-1972 | how syphilis affects body (US gov) African men men told they were being treated for bad blood (never treated only placebos) drugs for syphilis came out men werent given any or told they had it Issue: target minority, no consent, lack of Beneficene, |
| Issue with allowing Syphilis to get to Tertiary stage | spreads to brain and nervous system (mental confusion and dementia) spread to eyes (loss of sight to blindness) Spread to ears (loss of hearing, vertigo, tinnitus) |
| Willowbrook Study 1956-1970 | mentally disabled children inject w hep A and some w a cure (wasnt a cure, everyone got it) lack of space in willow meant if you didnt consent for your child to do it, your child couldnt go to willow |
| Issue with Willowbrook study | coercion of parents no consent of kids lack of safeguards to protect those without hep A marg comm. |
| “Tearoom Sex” Study 1960s | lifestyles of gay men and popular gay stereotypes (found not pervs and most married w wife and kids) would go to see sex b/w men in restrooms (Tearooms). offered to be guard the door Followed them home and did interview on family w wife w false pretences |
| Issue with Tearoom sex study | uninformed consent, stalking, deception, no research consent at all, target marg community |
| Belmont's Report of Basic Ethical Principals | RESPECT for person (acknow autonomy (informed/considered consent), protect w diminished auto) BENEFICENCE, do no harm and max benefits + min harms JUSTICE do research across all groups (not just convient) and cost should be borne by all |
| Institutional Review Board (IRB) Goals | risk to subject min, risk reasonable in relation to benefits, selection of subject is equitable, informed consent (given + doc) privacy +confidentiality, offer add. safeguard for subject easily coercion +vulnerable, researcher makes provisions correct |