Help
Options
Didn't know it?
click below
click below
Knew it?
click below
click below
Don't Know
Remaining cards (0)
Know
retry
shuffle
restart
0:00
Embed Code - If you would like this activity on your web page, copy the script below and paste it into your web page.
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Ap gov required case
| Name | Facts |
|---|---|
| McCulloch v. Maryland | Tried to tax a federal bank, court ruled it was unconstitutional (supremacy clause) |
| United States v. Lopez | Congress made a law banning guns on school property, court ruled it was unconstitutional (commerce clause) |
| Engel v. Vitale | Court ruled school prayer unconstitutional (establishment clause) |
| Wisconsin v. Yoder | Court ruled requiring school past middle school unconstitutional (freedom of religion) |
| Tinker v. Des Moines | School prevented students from wearing armbands to school as protest, court ruled unconstitutional (freedom of religion) |
| New York Times v. US | Newspaper published leaked papers, US tried to prevent them, court ruled newspaper could publish (freedom of press) |
| Schenck v. US | Someone tried to publish pamphlets telling people to dodge the draft, US said they couldn't, court agreed with US (freedom of speech) |
| Gideon v. Wainwright | Someone had to defend themselves in court because Florida wouldn't give them a lawyer, later sued and court agreed with dude. (right to counsel) |
| McDonald v. Chicago | Someone sued their state because of strict gun laws, and the court agreed with the dude. (right to bear arms) |
| Brown v. Board of Education | Overruled plessy v Ferguson, ruled seperate but equal doctrine unconstitutional (equal protection clause) |
| Citizens United v. FEC | Company made ad for Hillary too close to the election, argued the 30/60 day rule was unconstitutional and court agreed. also no more limits on how much people can spend on candidates (freedom of speech) |
| Baker v. Carr | Tennessee hadn't redistricted in a while, and someone from an urban area sued. Court agreed with the person, establishing that gerrymandering is subject to judicial review (equal protection clause) |
| Shaw v. reno | North carolina changed district to include more minority districts. Someone sued and the court agreed, showing that racial gerrymandering was unconstitutional (equal protection clause) |
| Marbury v. madison | Jefferson refused to deliver appointment of Adam's last minute appointments. Case went to court because of a law that changed the court's jurisdiction. court said the law was unconstitutional. Established judicial review (juristiction clause of Article 3) |
Created by:
EvelynChen
Popular History sets