Help
Options
Didn't know it?
click below
click below
Knew it?
click below
click below
Don't Know
Remaining cards (0)
Know
retry
shuffle
restart
0:00
Embed Code - If you would like this activity on your web page, copy the script below and paste it into your web page.
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Normal Size Small Size show me how
DBQ Practice
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| A | DBQ Rubric - (7 pts) |
| B | Thesis/Claim (0-1 pt) |
| C | responds to prompt w/ historically defensible claim & establishes a line of reasoning (1 pt) |
| D | earn point: thesis must respond to prompt, not restate / 1+ sentences in one place / in intro or conclusion |
| E | Contextualization (0-1 pt) |
| F | describe broader historical context relevant to prompt (1 pt) |
| G | earn point: relate topic of prompt to broader historic events before, after, or during the question's time frame / no point for phrase or reference |
| H | Evidence (0-3 pts) |
| I | Evidence from Documents: 1 pt - content from 3 documents to address topic of prompt / 2 pts - supports argument in response to prompt with 6 documents |
| J | earn 1 pt: describe content from 3 documents / earn 2 pts - describe content from 6 documents & use content to support argument in response to the prompt |
| K | Evidence Beyond Documents: 1 pt - at least one piece of evidence outside documents relevant to an argument about the prompt |
| L | earn point: must describe evidence, not a phrase or reference / different from evidence used for contextualization point |
| M | Analysis & Reasoning (0-2 pts) |
| N | for 3 documents - explain why document's POV/purpose/audience/historical situation is relevant to an argument ( 1 pt) |
| O | earn point: explain how 3 documents' POV/purpose/audience/historic situation is relevant to an argument about the prompt |
| P | demonstrate complex understanding of the prompt's focus / use evidence to corroborate, qualify, or modify an argument addressing the question (1 pt) |
| Q | response - demonstrates complex understanding in many ways: explain nuance of issue; analyze multiple variables / explain both sim & diff, cont & change, explain multiple cause, cause & effect / explain relevant connections across periods |
| Q part 2 | confirm validity or argument; corroborate multiple perspectives / qualifying; modifying argument; consider alternate views or evidence (understanding must be part of argument, not a phrase or reference) |
| R | reporting category |
| S | scoring criteria |
| T | decision rules |
Created by:
jw5397
Popular Social Studies sets