click below
click below
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Babbie ch 5
conceptualize, operationalize and measure
Term | Definition |
---|---|
conceptions | mental images we use as summary devices for bringing together observations and experiences that seem to have something in common. |
concepts | constructs; they represent the agreed-upon meanings we assign to terms. |
Our concepts don't exist in the real world, so they can't be measured directly, but..... | it's possible to measure the things that these summarize. |
conceptualization | the process of specifying observations and measurements that give concepts definite meaning for the purposes of a research study. |
Operational definitions | specify how variables relevant to a concept will be measured. |
conceptualization includes | specifying the indicators of a concept and describing its dimensions. |
precise definitions are more important in what type of study | descriptive |
operationalization | specifies the exact procedures that will be used to measure the attributes of variables. |
Operationalization involves a series of interrelated choices including: | specifying the range of variation that is appropriate, determining how precisely to measure, accounting for dimensions of variables, defining the attributes of variables and their relationships, and deciding on an appropriate level of measurement. |
four levels of measures | nominal,ordinal,interval, and ratio |
When in doubt, researchers should use the ___________of measurement possible. Why? | highest level, so they can capture the greatest amount of information |
Where does operationalization begin and end? | it begins in the design phase and continues through all phases of the project, including analysis. |
criteria of the quality of measures | precision, accuracy, reliability, and validity |
reliability | getting consistent results from the same measure |
validity | getting results that accurately reflect the concept being measured |
Four ways researchers can improve the reliability of their measures | test-retest method, the split-half method, the use of established measures, and the examination of work performed by research workers. |
yardsticks for assessing a measure's validity include: | face validity, criterion-related validity, construct validity, and content validity. |
Best way to preserve richness of meaning of general concepts? | using several different measures |
indicator | a trend or fact, that indicates the state or level of something |
nominal measure | differentiates between items or subjects based only on their names or (meta-)categories and other qualitative classifications they belong to |
Ordinal measure | allows for rank order (1st, 2nd, 3rd, etc.) by which data can be sorted |
interval measure | allows for the degree of difference between items, but not the ratio between them. |
ratio measure | possesses a meaningful (unique and non-arbitrary) zero value. |
face validity | the extent to which a test is subjectively viewed as covering the concept it purports to measure. It refers to the transparency or relevance of a test as it appears to test participants. |
criterion-related validity | a measure of how well one variable or set of variables predicts an outcome based on information from other variables |
construct validity | the degree to which a test measures what it claims, or purports, to be measuring |
content validity | refers to the extent to which a measure represents all facets of a given social construct. |
test-retest | the variation in measurements taken by a single person or instrument on the same item and under the same conditions. |
split-half method | Administering a test to a group of individuals, Splitting the test in half, Correlating scores on one half of the test with scores on the other half of the test, correlation between these two split halves is used in estimating the reliability of the test |