click below
click below
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Locke vs. Hobbs
Whats the difference between the philosophies of John Locke and Thomas Hobbs
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| Became a tutor to a very wealthy family having access to many books | Hobbs |
| Lived in Paris through the English Civil Wars and interested in the nature of government | Hobbs |
| Saw humans as naturally selfish and quick to fight | Hobbs |
| One of the first of his era to discuss the idea of a social contract between people and their government | Hobbs |
| Wrote a book called Leviathan | Hobbs |
| Believed a single sovereign, or ruler, should have total authority over the people | Hobbs |
| Believed in a monarchy led by a king | Hobbs |
| More concerned with protection and order than rights | Hobbs |
| Started his career as a doctor, but ended up a philosopher and political scientist | Locke |
| His writings influenced many founding fathers, especially Thomas Jefferson | Locke |
| Wrote a book called An Essay Concerning Human Understanding | Locke |
| In his book he introduced the idea of "tabula rasa" which states people are born with a mind like a blank slate or page | Locke |
| Imagined a set of natural rights that human beings share such as life, liberty and property | Locke |
| Believed natural rights aren't given to people but rather they are born with them | Locke |
| Believed the purpose of government is to end the state of nature and give people certain protections of their natural rights | Locke |
| Believed a government can only be legitimate, or valid, if it is based on a social contract with citizens | Locke |
| Believed that if the government fails to deliver, the people have the right to revolt | Locke |