Save
Upgrade to remove ads
Busy. Please wait.
Log in with Clever
or

show password
Forgot Password?

Don't have an account?  Sign up 
Sign up using Clever
or

Username is available taken
show password


Make sure to remember your password. If you forget it there is no way for StudyStack to send you a reset link. You would need to create a new account.
Your email address is only used to allow you to reset your password. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.


Already a StudyStack user? Log In

Reset Password
Enter the associated with your account, and we'll email you a link to reset your password.
focusNode
Didn't know it?
click below
 
Knew it?
click below
Don't Know
Remaining cards (0)
Know
0:00
Embed Code - If you would like this activity on your web page, copy the script below and paste it into your web page.

  Normal Size     Small Size show me how

Comparative Politics

Midterm

TermDefinition
Legislative bodies - composition Speaker (Board)  Steering Committee  Committees  Party Groups
Parliaments & foreign policy International treaties  Defense policy  Parliamentary diplomacy
American tradition of Coalition Theory games theory (rational choice) office seeking zero-sum game minimal winning coalitions
minimal winning coalitions maximizing the share of power, minimizing the costs  coalition with a majority in legislative body offering the largest possible share of power to all its members
European tradition of Coalition Theory policy seeking ideological distance minimal winning coalitions vs. “deviant” cases
“deviant” cases minority governments (executive vs. legislative coalitions viable vs. effective cabinets )  surplus majority governments (“grand coalitions”)
Types of Minimal winning coalitions minimum size coalition (1)  with the minimal number of parties (bargaining proposition) (2)  minimal range coalition (3)  minimal connected winning coalition (4)
Maurice Duverger (Party Systems) number of parties  one-party, two-party, multiparty systems
Jean Blondel (Party Systems) number and relative (electoral) strength  two-and-a-half-party system
Giovanni Sartori (Party Systems) number and ideological distance
Non-Competitive Systems (Typology of G. Sartori) single-party system hegemonic-party system
Competitive Systems (Typology of G. Sartori) predominant-party system two-party system (bipartism) limited (moderate) pluralism extreme (polarized) pluralism atomised pluralismus
Political party: definition  permanent organizational structure  local organizations and central leadership  ideological orientation and/or presentation of a determinate program  existence of basic political goal
interest group political parties try to gain the power, while interest groupst just want to influcence it (Duverger)
Political party: definition (Sartori)  Any political group that presents at elections, and is capable of placing through elections, candidates for public office
For long-term functioning, parties need to have a stable link to a “hard core” of voters have a solid basis of membership have a well-marked ideological and political identity
Origin of poitical parties, Maurice Duverger internally-generated: within parliament (conservatives, liberals) externally-generated: outside parliament (socialists)  the origin affects the organizational structure and strategy of campaign
Origin of political parties Stein Rokkan cleavages national revolution: centre vs. periphery state vs. church industrial revolution: urban vs. rural owner vs. worker
New cleavages materialism vs. post-materialism european integration (?) Central and Eastern Europe - transformation cleavages (socio-economic, nationalist), communism vs. anti-communism…
Party families  Criteria for typology origin of parties ideological and political profile membership in supranational organizations
Political parties: organizational types Duverger Cadre Party, Mass Party
Political parties: organizational types Kirchheimer Party of individual representation, Party of mass integration, Catch-all party
Political parties: organizational types Panebianco Mass burocratic party, Electoral- professional party
Political parties: organizational types Katz & Mair Elite party, Mass party, Catch-all party, Cartel party
Electoral systems, functions, input/ouput transform voters’ preferences (input) into seats in elected body (output)
Electoral systems, functions, proportionality provide important segments of society with an adequate representation (proportionality)
Electoral systems, functions, effectiveness enable effective government (effectiveness)
Electoral systems, functions, personalization create a link between voter and elected representative (personalisation)
Duverger’s „law“ Plurality rule election system tends to favor a two-party system
Effects of Electoral Systems mechanic – recounting votes into mandates psychological – reaction of actors (voters and candidates) on the mechanic effect of the system
Plurality system / “First-past-the-post”  single-member constituency  strong psychological effect  can be extremely disproportional  high number of “wasted” votes
Majority systems  Two-round system  Alternative vote
Proportional representation (PR) influenced by electoral threshold district magnitude structure of candidate lists mathematical method
Parliamentary ○ Most European systems ○ UK ○ Parliament is directly elected ○ PM & cabinet are elected by parliament ○ There is a monarch, or parl elects pres Pres or monarch can take pressure off PM
Semi-Parliamentary ○ France, Slovakia, Finland, Iceland, Ireland ○ Directly elected parl and pres ○ PM and cabinet derived from parl ○ Weak pres - Slovakia ○ Pres strong on foreign policy - France (cohabitation)
Suprapresidentialism ○ Russia ○ Strong pres and weak parl ○ No checks and balances
Presidential ○ US ○ Not recommended for new democracies ○ Pres has all exec power ○ Directly elected (not entirely in US) ○ Legislative body also directly elected Exec and legislative branches are autonomous
Majoritarian Plurality systems One party cabinet One chamber parliament Unitary state Flexible constitution
Consensus Proportional systems Coalition cabinet Two chamber parliament Federation Rigid constitution
Electoral System Trade-Offs Proportionality, Effectiveness, Personalization
Created by: leechtn
Popular Social Studies sets

 

 



Voices

Use these flashcards to help memorize information. Look at the large card and try to recall what is on the other side. Then click the card to flip it. If you knew the answer, click the green Know box. Otherwise, click the red Don't know box.

When you've placed seven or more cards in the Don't know box, click "retry" to try those cards again.

If you've accidentally put the card in the wrong box, just click on the card to take it out of the box.

You can also use your keyboard to move the cards as follows:

If you are logged in to your account, this website will remember which cards you know and don't know so that they are in the same box the next time you log in.

When you need a break, try one of the other activities listed below the flashcards like Matching, Snowman, or Hungry Bug. Although it may feel like you're playing a game, your brain is still making more connections with the information to help you out.

To see how well you know the information, try the Quiz or Test activity.

Pass complete!
"Know" box contains:
Time elapsed:
Retries:
restart all cards