click below
click below
Normal Size Small Size show me how
APUSH 10 for 10
Question | Answer |
---|---|
Established Judicial Review | Marbury vs. Madison |
Decision stems from the Yazoo land cases and upholds the sanctity of contracts. | Flecher vs. Peck |
The court ruled that states cannot tax the federal government. "the power to tax is the power to destroy" | Mculloch vs. Maryland |
Clarified the commerce clause and affirmed Congressional power over interstate commerce. | Gibbons vs. Ogden |
Established that Indian tribes had rights to tribal lands that preceded all other American law. Only federal government could take land from the tribes. | Johnson vs. Macintosh |
Established tribal autonomy within their boundaries. tribes were "distinct political communities, having territorial boundaries within which their authority is exclusive." | Worcester vs. Georgia |
The interests of the community are more important than the interests of the business. the supremacy of society's interest over private interest. | Charles River Bridge vs. Warren Bridge. |
Declared that labor unios were lawful organizations and the strike was a lawful weapon. | Commonwealth vs. Hunt |
Chief Justice Taney ruled that this person was not a citizen and had no standing in court. | Scott vs. Sanford |
Ruled that a civilian cannot be tried in military courts while civil courts are availible. | Exparte Milligan |
Declared state passed Granger laws that regulated interstate commerce unconstitutional. | Wabash vs. Illinois |
Due to a narrow interpretation of the Sherman Anti Trust Act, the court undermined the authority of the federal government to act against monopolies. | Knight vs. US |
Legalized segregation in publicly owned facilities on the basis of "separate but equal" | Plessey vs. Fergeson |
Confirmed the right of the federal government to place tariffs on good entering the US. From US territories on the grounds that the "Constitution does not follow the flag" | Insular Cases |
Reestablished the authority of the federal government to fht monopolies under the Sherman Anti Trust Act | Northern Securities Co. vs. US |
First case to use the "Brandeis brief" recognized a 10 hour work day for women laundry workers on the grounds of health andn community concerns. | Muller vs. Oregon |
Declared that the Keating Owen Act unconstitutional on the grounds that it was an invasion of state. | Hammer vs. Dagenhart |
People who interfered with the war effor were subject to imprisonment "clear and present danger" | Sheric vs. US |
Unconstitutional minimum wage law for women on the grounds that it denied women freedom of contract. | Adkins vs. Children's Hospital |
"sick children case" declared the National Industry Recovery Act unconstitutional on the fact that it delegated legislative power to the executive, that there was a lack of constitutional authority, and it sought to regulate bus. thatwere whollyintrastate | Schechter vs. US |