click below
click below
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Luke Acts Final
Final for UBBL
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| Seven parts | Listener, Speaker, Decoding, Incoding, message, channels, feedback |
| listener | decoding |
| speaker | encoding |
| message | What the speaker intends to get accross(verbal/nonverbal (what he wants the listener to understand |
| feedback | responses (verbal/nonverbal of the listener |
| channel | the medium of the message/feedback:5 senses |
| Situation | time, place, context, occasion |
| interference | Anything that impedes the message wheter internal, external -semantics |
| Crediblity is the audience's | perception of th espeaker |
| Credibility has to aspects: | 1. Competence 2. Character |
| Competence | How an audience regards a speaker |
| Characer | How an audience regards a speaker's sincerity, trustworthiness, and concern for the well-being of the audience |
| Types of credibilty | 1. Initial credibility 2. Derived credibility 3. terminal credibility |
| How to establish creibility | Esplain comptetence, establish common ground w/ audience, deliver your speeches fluently , expressibely and with conviction |
| Evidence | Facts, examples, statistics, testimony |
| Things to remember when using and finding evidence | use specific, use novel, from credible sources, and make clear the point of evidence |
| Hasty generalization | A fallacy in which a speaker jumps to a genral principle to a specific conclusion |
| Reasoning from principle | reasoning that moves from a general principle to a specific conclusion |
| causal reasoning | do not assume that events have only a single cause |
| False cause | mistakenly assumes that because one event follow another, the first event was the cause of it |
| analogical reasoning | compares 2 similar events |
| red herring | A fallacy that introduces an irrelevant issue to divert attention from the subject under discussion |
| Persuasion: | The priocess of creating, reinforcing, or changing people's mind, beliefs or actions |
| Four classical appeals of persuation | 1. Logos-logic/reason 2. Pathos-emotion 3. Mythos-tradition (oral tradition 4. Ehtos (integrity (establishin my integrity |
| T/FDegrees of persuasion are always left to right | True |
| Degrees of persuasion | Strongly opposed-moderately opposed-slight opposed- neutral- slightly in favor- moderately in favor0strong in favor |
| Fact | A question of an assertion |
| Value | morality, worth of an idea |
| Policy | A question about whether a specific course of action |
| passive agreement | wou cares what they do, just agree with me |
| Immediate action | take action support policy |
| Need | Serious problem that needs to change |
| HWat does practicality mean | Will it solve the problem |
| Comparative advantage | Tow colutions, why mine is mroe realistic or better |
| Order for Persuation speech | Problem solution order, problemen-cause- solution, comparative advantage, |
| Monroes Motivated sequence | Attention, need, satisfaction, vizualization, action |
| Macguire | awareness, understanding, agreement, enactment, integration |
| Claim | Conclusion speaker desires |
| Wuestion of value, | A question about the worth, rightness, morality and so forht of an idea or action |
| A question of policy | specifc course of action should/not be taken |
| Problem solution order | first main point deals with existence, second with the solution |
| T/FMonroe seeks immediate action | True |
| Monroe's motivated sequence | Attention-get audience to listen 2.Need- to get audience to feel a need or want 3.Satisfaction -to tell audience how to fill need Visualization-to get audience to see benefits of solution Action -to get audience to take action |