Social Psychology
Help!
|
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
show | how we view our internal and external social worlds
🗑
|
||||
show | causes that we assign to behaviors
🗑
|
||||
show | no we like to believe that life is not random so we use attributions to help us understand it
🗑
|
||||
show | we see the cause as something outside the individual, something in the environment, something in the setting. aka if the setting had been different then the behavior might of been different
🗑
|
||||
show | things that you cannot change, your trip because you are clumsy, you miss class because of strep throat
🗑
|
||||
when are we more likely to engage in attributional thinking | show 🗑
|
||||
what matters in forming attributions: expectancy or success | show 🗑
|
||||
what are the two things that actually matter in forming attributions | show 🗑
|
||||
show | things that happen that we are surprised by
🗑
|
||||
self relevant outcomes | show 🗑
|
||||
show | how variant is it
🗑
|
||||
show | where do we find the cause of the individuals behavior
🗑
|
||||
are we ever willing to go against law #2 | show 🗑
|
||||
different dimensions of attribution | show 🗑
|
||||
show | situation or external
and
internal
🗑
|
||||
show | causes that are found in the environment, in the setting or situation
🗑
|
||||
show | trying to figure out the process that people go through in deciding that somebody's behavior is due to internal or external causes (chart)
🗑
|
||||
consistency | show 🗑
|
||||
show | all about this setting (not people, it is backwards) the extent to which this person does this behavior in other settings
🗑
|
||||
show | the extent to which other people do this behavior in other settings
🗑
|
||||
do we usually get attributions right | show 🗑
|
||||
discounting principal | show 🗑
|
||||
augmenting/strengthening | show 🗑
|
||||
show | other directed error is designed to explain the process of attriutions that are formed about other people, it is not about trying to find out why we did something it is other directed, about why other people have done something
🗑
|
||||
show | situations where we get wrong our guesses of causes of our behavior and others behavior
🗑
|
||||
show | you will do the best with what you have
🗑
|
||||
are we more likely to get attributions right or wrong | show 🗑
|
||||
show | we over emphasize and put too much weight on internal or dis-positional causes, we don't give enough weight to the potential role play by external or situation force
🗑
|
||||
focus of attention | show 🗑
|
||||
show | all about how stable is the cause
🗑
|
||||
show | how controllable is the cause
🗑
|
||||
two causes of atrributional errors | show 🗑
|
||||
Gilbert 3 stage factor theory | show 🗑
|
||||
what is stage one in gilberts three factor theory | show 🗑
|
||||
show | automatic internal
🗑
|
||||
show | effortful external
🗑
|
||||
what attributions are easier to come up with internal or external | show 🗑
|
||||
show | individualistic and collectavistic
🗑
|
||||
show | societies that put the emphasis on one person. USA, Canada, England, France. "phrases like be all you can be, reach your potential, externalize
🗑
|
||||
show | unit of analysis is at the group level, its not so important what each person does, it is more important how the group does. externalize
🗑
|
||||
show | internalize successes and externalize failures.
🗑
|
||||
who lacks the self serving bias | show 🗑
|
||||
show | teach self serving bias to people with low self esteem. a dr worked with somebody for 2 months when he barged into his office and said doctor i get it now, what you have been trying to teach me is what is so great about reality anyway.
🗑
|
||||
show | with
🗑
|
||||
hot approach | show 🗑
|
||||
show | there is not intent, no desire, no motive or purposeful behavior. rather this is just how we are made, it is just naturally how we work/are put together
🗑
|
||||
hot approach in terms of the self serving bias | show 🗑
|
||||
cold approach in terms of the self serving bias | show 🗑
|
||||
show | hot approach
🗑
|
||||
show | individualistic cultures
🗑
|
||||
ultimate attribution error | show 🗑
|
||||
self presentation | show 🗑
|
||||
show | what you wear, how yo do your hair or makeup, how long it takes you to get ready, and other things you do to change peoples perception of you
🗑
|
||||
show | when someone you do not like comes your way so you act negative and rude
🗑
|
||||
show | direct and indirect tactics
🗑
|
||||
show | you are going to present yourself in a positive way. when interviewing for a job.
🗑
|
||||
show | saying things bad about yourself. modesty and sandbagging
🗑
|
||||
modesty | show 🗑
|
||||
show | occurs prior to an event. here essentially you telling others around you that you might not do so well. ask students how they did after a test and they say they failed so that way if they did bad it doesnt look as bad and if they did good they look better
🗑
|
||||
physical environment | show 🗑
|
||||
what are three ways of strategically manipulating our group associations | show 🗑
|
||||
BIRG | show 🗑
|
||||
basking in reflected glory | show 🗑
|
||||
CORF | show 🗑
|
||||
Cutting off reflected failure | show 🗑
|
||||
show | going to resist the urge publicly to jump on the bandwagon and announce your association to a successful group because you are concerned about how that group will be perceived in the future.
🗑
|
||||
self perceptions | show 🗑
|
||||
show | self identity a brown larger folders and within that folder there are all these different folders about yourself, we are faster at processing self relevant information than anything else, our self is the first file for us to get to in the file cabinet
🗑
|
||||
show | terrible term (knowledge implies accuracy) it is more things that we believe about about ourselves
🗑
|
||||
is our self knowledge always accurate | show 🗑
|
||||
show | how other people respond to us (the looking glass self)
true inner self
🗑
|
||||
the looking glass self | show 🗑
|
||||
true inner self | show 🗑
|
||||
can our self knowledge change? | show 🗑
|
||||
self handicapping | show 🗑
|
||||
give an example of self handicapping | show 🗑
|
||||
show | we are concerned that we are going to fail and we want to protect our ego or self esteem
🗑
|
||||
ego/self esteem enhancement | show 🗑
|
||||
what are the two reasons why people self handicap | show 🗑
|
||||
show | our files about ourselves are the biggest
and it is also the first file that we get to in the file cabinet
🗑
|
||||
show | basking in reflected glory
cutting off reflective failure
and cutting off future failure
🗑
|
||||
identification | show 🗑
|
||||
show | bandura says that it is our beliefs that we can achieve a certain level of success on some task
🗑
|
||||
show | 1. past experiences
2. persuasion
3. vicariously through the observation of others
4. our INTERPRETATION of our level of our physiological arousal (it is not our level of arousal that matters, it is what we think our level of arousal means)
🗑
|
||||
show | 1. proximity
2. contact
3. similarity
4. reciprocity
5. misattributed arousal
6. affect
7. physical attractiveness
🗑
|
||||
what is law #4 | show 🗑
|
||||
what is attractive | show 🗑
|
||||
what are the two lines of research in initial stages of attraction | show 🗑
|
||||
show | people we are closer to (as in feet, miles, ect.) we tend to like more
🗑
|
||||
contact | show 🗑
|
||||
show | we like people who are like us. whether it is background, likes and dislikes, attitudes, ect.
🗑
|
||||
reciprocity | show 🗑
|
||||
affect | show 🗑
|
||||
misattributed arousal | show 🗑
|
||||
show | different by culture. the key is perception. people tend to view peoples traits as long as it does not deviate from there perception of normal
🗑
|
||||
show | we tend to match up with people in terms of level of attraction.
🗑
|
||||
what happens when you rate your significant other | show 🗑
|
||||
show | global vs specific
trait vs state
personal vs social/collective
🗑
|
||||
global self esteem | show 🗑
|
||||
specific self esteem | show 🗑
|
||||
show | long term self esteem enduring, chronic. how you USUALLY feel about yourself
🗑
|
||||
state self esteem | show 🗑
|
||||
personal self esteem | show 🗑
|
||||
social collective self esteem | show 🗑
|
||||
what are the two levels of self esteem | show 🗑
|
||||
what are two things you should consider about self esteem | show 🗑
|
||||
high self esteem stable | show 🗑
|
||||
high self esteem unstable | show 🗑
|
||||
show | never like themselves
🗑
|
||||
show | usually hate themselves but sometimes they have their good days
🗑
|
||||
show | 1. they have a confused self concept-they dont know who they are
2. they generally have a highly negative self identity
3. it is a myth that they want bad things to happen to them, they want good things to happen to the
🗑
|
||||
show | high self esteem they like themselves more and more, do they like themselves yeah and they want to like themselves even more
🗑
|
||||
show | low self esteem. hold on to what little they like about themselves and dont try to find anything else. all about not losing what they have
🗑
|
||||
double bind | show 🗑
|
||||
double bind with high self esteem people | show 🗑
|
||||
double bind with low self esteem people | show 🗑
|
||||
show | 1. downward social compare: THEY ONLY DO THIS ON THEIR "BEST" TRAIT. compare their self to people that are under them
2. self verification: they self verify positive in this area
3. self serving bias only in their best area
🗑
|
||||
show | they score themselves low globally but when to asked about their best trait they scored high. as opposed to high self esteem people who score globally high and specifically higher
🗑
|
||||
prejudice | show 🗑
|
||||
show | 1. affective component: not like people, be in a bad mood when they have to work with those people
2. behavioral component: discrimination
3. cognitive component: stereotype
🗑
|
||||
do people who are prejudice show all three dimensions of prejudice | show 🗑
|
||||
what are the sources of prejudice | show 🗑
|
||||
show | unequal status, people use prejudice to justify their own status
🗑
|
||||
show | law 2 & 3. fundamental attribution error since our brain likes it easy we rely on the internal. we form these internal attribution based on gender and race, ect. if you are overloaded cognitively you are going to rely on the internal attribution.
🗑
|
||||
show | sometimes individuals reside in an environment that is full of people who are prejudice and one of the ways they realize if they are going to survive in that environment is to conform to the prejudice of that environment
🗑
|
||||
prejudice: institutions | show 🗑
|
||||
prejudice: limited resources | show 🗑
|
||||
prejudice: social learning | show 🗑
|
||||
ingroup favoritism | show 🗑
|
||||
outgroup favoritism | show 🗑
|
||||
self esteem hypothesis | show 🗑
|
||||
show | larger
🗑
|
||||
show | outgroups stick out more
🗑
|
||||
show | negtive ingroup most negative
🗑
|
Review the information in the table. When you are ready to quiz yourself you can hide individual columns or the entire table. Then you can click on the empty cells to reveal the answer. Try to recall what will be displayed before clicking the empty cell.
To hide a column, click on the column name.
To hide the entire table, click on the "Hide All" button.
You may also shuffle the rows of the table by clicking on the "Shuffle" button.
Or sort by any of the columns using the down arrow next to any column heading.
If you know all the data on any row, you can temporarily remove it by tapping the trash can to the right of the row.
To hide a column, click on the column name.
To hide the entire table, click on the "Hide All" button.
You may also shuffle the rows of the table by clicking on the "Shuffle" button.
Or sort by any of the columns using the down arrow next to any column heading.
If you know all the data on any row, you can temporarily remove it by tapping the trash can to the right of the row.
Embed Code - If you would like this activity on your web page, copy the script below and paste it into your web page.
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Created by:
mreel91
Popular Psychology sets