click below
click below
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Sociocultural ERQs
End of Year I Exam
Question | Answer |
---|---|
ERQ Introduction Paragraph | Hook; State Topic; Describe issues raised; Explain Importance; Summarize studies |
ERQ General Knowledge Paragraph | State relevant theory; Evaluate study; Link to topic |
ERQ Evidence Paragraph | Detailed description of study; explain what study tells; link to topic |
Research Methods, Ethical Considerations | Tajfel (1971); Howarth (2002) |
Social Identity Theory | Tajfel (1971); Howarth (2002) |
Social Cognitive Theory | Bandura (1961); Konjin (2007) |
Development of Stereotypes | Hamilton and Rose (1980); Hamilton and Gifford (1976) |
Effect of Stereotypes | Cohen (1981); Steele and Aronson (1995) |
Tajfel Aim | Test whether grouping is enough to produce prejudice between groups of similar people |
Tajfel Participants | 48 14-15 year old boys |
Tajfel Procedures | Assigned to two groups; Distribute money using a matrix |
Tajfel Results | Fairer choices with same group interactions; More money to same group. |
Tajfel Conclusions | Further research was necessary to make a conclusion |
Tajfel Strengths | Laboratory method controls variables; cause and effect possible to be established; Replicable |
Tajfel Weaknesses | Biased samples; Low ecological validity |
Bandura Aim | Determine whether children would replicate aggressive behavior |
Bandura Participants | 36 male children; 36 female children |
Bandura Procedures | Aggressive model, nonaggressive model, or no model; Same or opposite sex model; Observed for 20 minutes |
Bandura Results | Children with aggressive model more imitative of aggressive responses; Girls more physical aggressive if model male, verbal if model was female; Boys likely to imitate same sex models |
Bandura Conclusions | Witnessing aggression in a model enough to produce aggression by an observer |
Bandura Strengths | Controlled variables |
Bandura Weaknesses | Ecological validity; inconsistent with similar research; Ethics |
Konjin Aim | |
Konjin Participants | |
Konjin Procedures | |
Konjin Results | |
Konjin Conclusions | |
Konjin Strengths | |
Konjin Weaknesses |