Psych 111: Intro to Psych
Help!
|
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
examines the influence of social processes on the way people think, feel, and behave. | show 🗑
|
||||
advertising deal with ______ | show 🗑
|
||||
show | Attitudes
🗑
|
||||
show | Attitude Strength
🗑
|
||||
if it lasts over time. | show 🗑
|
||||
show | Impact
🗑
|
||||
initial perceptions makes a difference; have shown strong effects. | show 🗑
|
||||
Asch's study found that a person presented with a list of "+" traits first was found to be more sociable and happier than a person presented with a list of "-" traits first. | show 🗑
|
||||
presence of others energizes performance; if more people are around, behavior is different. | show 🗑
|
||||
show | Triplett
🗑
|
||||
show | Triplett
🗑
|
||||
show | Social Norms
🗑
|
||||
show | Social Norms
🗑
|
||||
a set of norms which characterize how people in specific social positions should behave. | show 🗑
|
||||
show | Social Role
🗑
|
||||
show | Role Conflict
🗑
|
||||
student, member of club, sorority member, daughter -- roles can clash (often common for working parents, sick child, expected to stay home and care for kid, but also have a job to teach students material that is on the exam). | show 🗑
|
||||
show | Conformity
🗑
|
||||
follow the opinions of those we believe have accurate knowledge and beleive they are doing right. | show 🗑
|
||||
show | Informational Social Influence
🗑
|
||||
conform to obtain rewards that come from being accepted by other people while trying to avoid rejection. | show 🗑
|
||||
Example: booing people when they don't continue the wave at the football games; passing the football out of the stadium, why do we follow it? no one knows. | show 🗑
|
||||
see others engaging in a behavior, likely to be influenced by it. | show 🗑
|
||||
show | Situational Influence on Behaviors
🗑
|
||||
Example: people dancing the waltz in the supermarket. | show 🗑
|
||||
show | Asch Conformity Study
🗑
|
||||
show | Asch Conformity Study
🗑
|
||||
group size + presence of a dissenter | show 🗑
|
||||
conformity increased from 5-35% as group size increased. After 5 wrong people, this stabilized (more wrong people up to 5, increased conformity). | show 🗑
|
||||
when someone else dissents they serve as a model and it significantly reduces conformity. doesn't go along with the group. | show 🗑
|
||||
show | LaPiere Study
🗑
|
||||
show | LaPiere Study
🗑
|
||||
show | Attitudes and Behavior Influntial Factors
🗑
|
||||
show | Attitudes and Behavior Influntial Factors
🗑
|
||||
show | Attitudes and Behavior Influntial Factors
🗑
|
||||
show | Attitudes and Behavior Influntial Factors
🗑
|
||||
show | Attitudes and Behavior Influntial Factors
🗑
|
||||
show | Persuasion
🗑
|
||||
show | Factor of Persuasion
🗑
|
||||
show | Message Factors
🗑
|
||||
in person, on tv/radio (putting a pretty woman next to a car), autotape, computer. | show 🗑
|
||||
personality, expectations (forewarning), strength of preexisting attitudes, prior knowledge of the issue. | show 🗑
|
||||
show | Norm of Reciprocity
🗑
|
||||
Example: let us come clean 1 room in your house for free! And then try to sell you a vacuum. | show 🗑
|
||||
Example: when buying a car, the saleswoman took $ out of her pocket to buy customer a drink. | show 🗑
|
||||
show | Door in the Face Technique
🗑
|
||||
show | Foot in the Door
🗑
|
||||
persuader gets you to commit to an action then before you peform it the "cost increases" | show 🗑
|
||||
show | Low-Balling
🗑
|
||||
Example: experiment asks students to come at 7am, got 24% consent rate. then asked another group how many would be willing to participate in study, 54% said yes (didn't know what time it was at). 95% of those who signed up showed at 7am. | show 🗑
|
||||
form of compliance that occurs when people follow direct commands, usually from someone in an authorative position. | show 🗑
|
||||
show | Stanley Milgram's Obedience to Authority Research Project
🗑
|
||||
obedience was greater when the victim was out of sight. | show 🗑
|
||||
whether or not someone seemed to have expertise; obedience wa higher when figure was close and seemed expert. | show 🗑
|
||||
when another particiapnt in study pressed button, 93% obeyed because person didn't think that they were responsible since they didn't physically administer the shock. | show 🗑
|
||||
differences were weak or nonexistent. | show 🗑
|
||||
show | Cultural Differences
🗑
|
||||
show | Milrgram's Experiment
🗑
|
||||
show | Ethnic Issues of the Research (Milgram)
🗑
|
||||
show | Altruism
🗑
|
||||
show | Diffusion of Responsibility (Kitty Genovese)
🗑
|
||||
people are less likely to provide help when in groups. (someone else will do it). | show 🗑
|
||||
people always think someone else is calling 911. | show 🗑
|
||||
show | Latane + Darley
🗑
|
||||
show | Bystander Research --- Latane + Darley
🗑
|
||||
show | Perceived Responsibility
🗑
|
||||
Example: people help the man in the business suit more than they would help a homeless man. | show 🗑
|
||||
show | Factors that Influence Attractions to others
🗑
|
||||
being near increases likelihood; availability increases attraction. | show 🗑
|
||||
show | Matching Hypothesis
🗑
|
||||
show | Walster + Berscheid
🗑
|
||||
show | Passionate Love
🗑
|
||||
show | Companionate Love
🗑
|
||||
1)Intimacy 2)Passion 3)Commitment | show 🗑
|
||||
show | Intimacy
🗑
|
||||
emotional, physical. | show 🗑
|
||||
show | Commitment
🗑
|
||||
show | Prejudice
🗑
|
||||
characteristics we attribute to people based on their membership in a group. | show 🗑
|
||||
show | Prejudice + Stereotypes
🗑
|
||||
treat people differently and unfairly based on group affiliation. | show 🗑
|
||||
we attribute our successes to personal factors and our failures to situational forces. We do opposite for others: assume others' failures are due to personal factors. | show 🗑
|
||||
increases prejudice. | show 🗑
|
||||
we categorize ourselves as "in group" or "out group" and view our members in more favorable terms. | show 🗑
|
||||
show | Homogeneity Bias
🗑
|
||||
Example: everyone in SDT is exactly the same, but you know within the group there is lots of diversity. | show 🗑
|
||||
Example: working together on a common task or goal (super-ordinate goal) is an effective way to reduce in/out group conflict. work together on a common goal. | show 🗑
|
||||
show | Zimbardo's Stanford Prison Study
🗑
|
||||
show | Zimbardo's Stanford Prison Study
🗑
|
||||
show | Fundamental Attribution Error
🗑
|
Review the information in the table. When you are ready to quiz yourself you can hide individual columns or the entire table. Then you can click on the empty cells to reveal the answer. Try to recall what will be displayed before clicking the empty cell.
To hide a column, click on the column name.
To hide the entire table, click on the "Hide All" button.
You may also shuffle the rows of the table by clicking on the "Shuffle" button.
Or sort by any of the columns using the down arrow next to any column heading.
If you know all the data on any row, you can temporarily remove it by tapping the trash can to the right of the row.
To hide a column, click on the column name.
To hide the entire table, click on the "Hide All" button.
You may also shuffle the rows of the table by clicking on the "Shuffle" button.
Or sort by any of the columns using the down arrow next to any column heading.
If you know all the data on any row, you can temporarily remove it by tapping the trash can to the right of the row.
Embed Code - If you would like this activity on your web page, copy the script below and paste it into your web page.
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Created by:
schlechy
Popular Psychology sets