Social and Affective Neuroscience Key Studies
Help!
|
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andari et al., (2010) | Oxytocin could act as part of a therapy for autism - cyberball experiment
🗑
|
||||
| Kosfeld et al., (2005) | Oxytocin increases trust in humans
Investor and trustee experiment
🗑
|
||||
| McGraw and Young (2010) | Montane voles do not bond for life and are less social
It is the location and amount of oxytocin which is important
🗑
|
||||
| Eisenberger et al., (2003) | Cyber ball experiment
Social rejection activates areas in the brain responsible for physical pain
🗑
|
||||
| Eisenberger et al., (2011) | Being in the presence of a partner protects you from physical pain as the vmPFC lights up which dampens other areas
🗑
|
||||
| Fisher et al., (2005) | 17 male and female participants - dopaminergic cells activated when partner's face viewed
🗑
|
||||
| Greene et al., (2008) | Dual-route hypothesis
When given a complex problem like trolley problem, frontal lobe needs to override limbic system
🗑
|
||||
| Hauser (2007) | Trolley problem
🗑
|
||||
| 85% | Of people think it is morally permissable to kill 1 person to save 5
🗑
|
||||
| 12% | Of people think it is morally permissable to push 1 person to save 5
🗑
|
||||
| Calder et al., (2007) | Brain regions involved in gaze perception
🗑
|
||||
| Posterior temporal sulcus | Codes gaze perception
🗑
|
||||
| Occipital cortex | Early visual analysis
🗑
|
||||
| Anterior superior temporal sulcus | Gaze perception
🗑
|
||||
| Amygdala and limbic areas | Social/emotional processing
🗑
|
||||
| Inferior parietal cortex | Spatial attention system
🗑
|
||||
| Jenkins et al., (2006) | Adaptation is used to see if there are specific cells in humans responsible for gaze perception
🗑
|
||||
| Phase 1 | Acuity test
Which way are eyes looking
🗑
|
||||
| Phase 2 | Adaptation
Eyes look left every time
🗑
|
||||
| Phase 3 | Same as 1 but if eyes look slightly left, more likely to say they are looking forward
🗑
|
||||
| Baron-Cohen | Modules for gaze processing
Eye direction detector (EDD)
Social attention mechanism (SAM)
Theory of mind mechanism (TOMM)
🗑
|
||||
| Perrett | Modules for gaze processing
Mutual attention mechanism (MAM)
Direction of attention detector (DAD)
🗑
|
||||
| Baron-Cohen et al., (1995) | ToM and gaze perception
Social interactions rely on efficient eye-gaze encoding
🗑
|
||||
| Bayliss et al., (2007) | Gaze-cueing
When you follow someone's gaze
🗑
|
||||
| Singer et al., (2004) | Distinction between regions for sensory aspects and affective components of pain
🗑
|
||||
| Patient SM | Bilateral damage to the amygdala impairs perception of emotion
🗑
|
||||
| Saxe and Kanwisher (2003) | Temporo-parietal junction as a region specific for ToM
🗑
|
||||
| Apperly and Butterfill (2009) | Two systems for belief representations
🗑
|
||||
| ToM lite | early developing, fast, inflexible, infants and animals
🗑
|
||||
| ToM | later developing, cognitively demanding, flexible, only in humans
🗑
|
||||
| Senju et al. | differences between implicit and explicit ToM
🗑
|
||||
| Baron-Cohen et al., (1985) | Sally-Anne task to test ToM
Differences between typically developing children and those with autism
🗑
|
||||
| de Lange (2008) | fMRI study between intention and means
🗑
|
||||
| Intention | posterior cingulate, medial prefrontal cortex
🗑
|
||||
| Means | superior temporal sulcus
🗑
|
||||
| Heider and Simmel (1944) | 3 shapes experiment involved superior temporal sulcus
🗑
|
||||
| Perrett et al., (1985) | cells in the superior temporal sulcus respond to certain types of body movements
🗑
|
||||
| Johansson (1973) | can detect gender, mood and weight from observing someone walking
🗑
|
||||
| Bruce and Young (1986) | cognitive model of face perception
🗑
|
||||
| Gauthier (1999; 2000) | Domain general approach
🗑
|
||||
| Domain general approach | all areas contribute to visual processing, but in different ways
FFA is for expertise
🗑
|
||||
| Downing et al., (2006) | images from 20 categories to see if any could activate FFA more than faces
🗑
|
||||
| Kanwisher (1997; 2000) | Domain specificity
🗑
|
||||
| Domain specificity | visual system is split into modules, key one being FFA
face inversion effect, holistic advantage, prosopagnosia all support
🗑
|
||||
| Patient WJ | prosopagnosia double dissociations
can recognise sheep but not faces
🗑
|
||||
| Yin (1969) | inversion effect
🗑
|
||||
| Frith and Frith (2009) | the use of neuroimaging and computational models has helped evolution of social behaviour
🗑
|
||||
| Bennett et al. | dead salmon experiment - key flaws in social neuroscience
🗑
|
Review the information in the table. When you are ready to quiz yourself you can hide individual columns or the entire table. Then you can click on the empty cells to reveal the answer. Try to recall what will be displayed before clicking the empty cell.
To hide a column, click on the column name.
To hide the entire table, click on the "Hide All" button.
You may also shuffle the rows of the table by clicking on the "Shuffle" button.
Or sort by any of the columns using the down arrow next to any column heading.
If you know all the data on any row, you can temporarily remove it by tapping the trash can to the right of the row.
To hide a column, click on the column name.
To hide the entire table, click on the "Hide All" button.
You may also shuffle the rows of the table by clicking on the "Shuffle" button.
Or sort by any of the columns using the down arrow next to any column heading.
If you know all the data on any row, you can temporarily remove it by tapping the trash can to the right of the row.
Embed Code - If you would like this activity on your web page, copy the script below and paste it into your web page.
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Created by:
2478267918864033
Popular Psychology sets