Busy. Please wait.
Log in with Clever
or

show password
Forgot Password?

Don't have an account?  Sign up 
Sign up using Clever
or

Username is available taken
show password

Your email address is only used to allow you to reset your password. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.


Already a StudyStack user? Log In

Reset Password
Enter the associated with your account, and we'll email you a link to reset your password.

Supreme Court Cases to know for AP US Gov

Quiz yourself by thinking what should be in each of the black spaces below before clicking on it to display the answer.
        Help!  

Question
Answer
Engel v. Vitale (1962)   show
🗑
Abington School District v. Schempp (1963)   show
🗑
show Unconstitutional to reimburse nonpublic schools because it violates the Establishment Clause. Lemon test, (1) ecular legilstaive purpose (2) not advance or inhibit religion and (3) no excessive government entanglement.  
🗑
Wallace v. Jaffree (1985)   show
🗑
Schenck v. US (1919) -   show
🗑
show The First Amendment applies to the states. A state may forbid speech and publication if they have a tendency to result in action dangerous to public security. There is a “dangerous tendency” test that it must pass.  
🗑
Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969)   show
🗑
show Wearing armbands is akin to pure speech so it is protected by the first amendment. Although school environments imply limitations on free expression, here the principals lack justifications for inposing limits.  
🗑
show Desecration of the American flag is an expression protected under the First Amendment. Also, the government may not prohibit the expression of an idea simply because society finds it disagreeable.  
🗑
show Nixon’s efforts to prevent the publication of the Pentagon Papers in the NY Times was unconstitutional, because it would not cause an inevitable, direct, and immediate event imperiling the safety of American forces.  
🗑
Buckley v. Valeo (1976)   show
🗑
US v. Nixon (1974)   show
🗑
show Obscene materials are not under the First Amendment protection. Test for obscenity: (a) prurient interest (b) depicts or describes sexual conduct specifically defined by state law and (c) lacks literary, artistic, political, or science value  
🗑
show Obscenity is not “within the area of constitutionally protected speech or press.” Test: “whether to the average person, applying contemporary community standards, the dominant theme of the material taken as a whole appeals to prurient interest.”  
🗑
show It’s appropriate for a school to prohibit the use of vulgar and offensive language because inconsistent with “fundamental values of public school education.”  
🗑
Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier (1988)   show
🗑
show You can’t censor or prohibit a publication in advance, but the communication can be punishable after publication.  
🗑
show Struck down anti-indecency provisions of the Communications Decency Act (the CDA), finding they violated the freedom of speech provisions of the First Amendment  
🗑
Mapp v. Ohio (1961)   show
🗑
show The Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures requires the police to obtain a search warrant in order to wiretap a public pay phone.  
🗑
New Jersey v. TLO (1985)   show
🗑
Griswold v. Connecticut (1965)   show
🗑
show upheld a Missouri law that imposed restrictions on the use of state funds, facilities and employees in performing, assisting with, or counseling on abortions  
🗑
Roe v. Wade (1973)   show
🗑
show new standard to determine the validity of laws restricting abortions: whether it is an “undue burden,”  
🗑
show partial abortions are okay and do not constitute an undue burden.  
🗑
show Legalized segregation in publicly owned facilities on the basis of "separate but equal."  
🗑
Brown v. Board of Education (1954 and 1955)   show
🗑
Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978)   show
🗑
Gratz v. Bollinger (2003)   show
🗑
show upheld the affirmative action admissions policy because the Law School conducts highly individualized reviews of each applicant, so no acceptance or rejection is based solely on race.  
🗑
show The Texas law, which made it a crime for two people of the same age to engage in sexual conduct, violates the Due Process Clause.  
🗑
show The court upheld the constitutionality of detention camps for Japanese-Americans during World War 2.  
🗑
Baker v. Carr (1962)   show
🗑
show Districts have to be approximately equal in population, with a “one person, one vote.”  
🗑
Shaw v. Reno   show
🗑
Fletcher v. Peck (1810)   show
🗑
U.S. v. Lopez (1995)   show
🗑
Clinton v. NY (1998)   show
🗑
Barron v. Baltimore (1833)   show
🗑
Furman v. Georgia   show
🗑
NRLB v. Laughlin Steel   show
🗑
show Procedures to determine whether a defendant should receive the death penalty  
🗑
US v. Morrison   show
🗑
show legislative veto is unconstitutional  
🗑
Printz v. US   show
🗑
show unconstitutional to mandate gender discrimination  
🗑
show Buses for religious schools are OK  
🗑
Smith v. Alwright   show
🗑


   

Review the information in the table. When you are ready to quiz yourself you can hide individual columns or the entire table. Then you can click on the empty cells to reveal the answer. Try to recall what will be displayed before clicking the empty cell.
 
To hide a column, click on the column name.
 
To hide the entire table, click on the "Hide All" button.
 
You may also shuffle the rows of the table by clicking on the "Shuffle" button.
 
Or sort by any of the columns using the down arrow next to any column heading.
If you know all the data on any row, you can temporarily remove it by tapping the trash can to the right of the row.

 
Embed Code - If you would like this activity on your web page, copy the script below and paste it into your web page.

  Normal Size     Small Size show me how
Created by: asdfalice
Popular AP Comparative Gov. sets