Question | Answer |
"the american voter" | campbell et al |
challenges to minimalism (did study) | 1.lane 2.nie et al 3. sniderman |
found that boring election=boring, more ideology the election=more ideology the ppl | nie et all |
said we use short cuts | sniderman |
said as long as we have divisions of labor then its good | sniderman |
had problem with minimalist study | zaller and feldman |
"nature of belief systems" | converse |
found that we had 5-clear cut categories | converse |
found ppl had latent idology | lane |
talked to factory workers | lane |
"voice and equality" | vierbia et al |
replaced ques with heaustics | sniderman |
said parties prevented artificial agreeance | madison |
hated parties | washington |
said ppl were layers (it is not black and white) | zaller and feldman |
believe ppl are internally conflicted | zaller and feldman |
"bowling alone" | ronald putman |
understands why we are study (b/c we do not participate in grps | ronald putman |
says your vote does not mean the same, ppl with money matter, and ppl who have money participate | verba et al |
looked at PID/canidate evaluation/issue positions | campbell et al |
said it is irration to join large interest groups | mancur olsen |
our countries 1st carl rose | van buren |
loved ppl organizing | van buren |
loved parties | van buren |
said parties are bad, but inevitable | madison |