Help
Options
Didn't know it?
click below
click below
Knew it?
click below
click below
Don't Know
Remaining cards (0)
Know
retry
shuffle
restart
0:00
Embed Code - If you would like this activity on your web page, copy the script below and paste it into your web page.
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Normal Size Small Size show me how
pols (names)
ppl on pols final
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| "the american voter" | campbell et al |
| challenges to minimalism (did study) | 1.lane 2.nie et al 3. sniderman |
| found that boring election=boring, more ideology the election=more ideology the ppl | nie et all |
| said we use short cuts | sniderman |
| said as long as we have divisions of labor then its good | sniderman |
| had problem with minimalist study | zaller and feldman |
| "nature of belief systems" | converse |
| found that we had 5-clear cut categories | converse |
| found ppl had latent idology | lane |
| talked to factory workers | lane |
| "voice and equality" | vierbia et al |
| replaced ques with heaustics | sniderman |
| said parties prevented artificial agreeance | madison |
| hated parties | washington |
| said ppl were layers (it is not black and white) | zaller and feldman |
| believe ppl are internally conflicted | zaller and feldman |
| "bowling alone" | ronald putman |
| understands why we are study (b/c we do not participate in grps | ronald putman |
| says your vote does not mean the same, ppl with money matter, and ppl who have money participate | verba et al |
| looked at PID/canidate evaluation/issue positions | campbell et al |
| said it is irration to join large interest groups | mancur olsen |
| our countries 1st carl rose | van buren |
| loved ppl organizing | van buren |
| loved parties | van buren |
| said parties are bad, but inevitable | madison |
Created by:
fall2011
Popular Science sets