Help
Options
Didn't know it?
click below
click below
Knew it?
click below
click below
Don't Know
Remaining cards (0)
Know
retry
shuffle
restart
0:00
Embed Code - If you would like this activity on your web page, copy the script below and paste it into your web page.
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Antitrust_
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| Doctrine: Horizontal and vertical combinations outlawed | Sherman Section 1 |
| Cases: Horizontal Geographic divisions are per se bad | Topco and Palmer |
| Doctrine: Lobbying for a law is not a violation of antitrust | Noerr-Pennington |
| Cases: Vertical tying arrangement | Jefferson Parish |
| Cases: Determining whether one or two objects in tying arrangement | Jefferson Parish |
| Cases: Rigid ratios of tying arrangements | Loews |
| HHI: Significance | Higher is more concentrated. 1800 is the tipping point. |
| HHI: Calculation | Market share of A^2 + Market share of B^2 +... |
| Cases: Resale Price Management per se illegal (overturned) | Dr. Miles (overturned) |
| Cases: Resale Price Management under Rule of Reason | Leegin |
| Cases: Vertical territorial and customer restraints | Sylvania |
| Cases: Vertical restraints under Rule of Reason | Sylvania |
| Cases: Vertical restraints per se illegal (overturned) | Schwinn (overturned) |
| Cases: Attempt to monopolize by bundling | Microsoft |
| Cases: Attempt to monopolize, Sherman Section 2 | Microsoft |
| Cases: "Price fixing" is a term of art for a per se test | ASCAP |
| Cases: Defines price fixing | Socony-Vaccuum |
| Doctrine: Price fixing | Anything that raises, lowers, affects, or stabilizing price |
| Cases: Set up sales agency for large part of the market, held legal | Appalachian Coals |
| Doctrine: Necessary market power for Rule of Reason test | ~70-80% |
| Cases: Output reductions are a form of price fixing | Socony-Vaccuum |
| Doctrine: Heightened requirements on mergers | Section 7 of Clayton Act |
| Doctrine: State Action Defense | Never a violation of antitrust is an actor, other actors if "pursuant to clearly articulated state action" |
| Cases: Control of market depends on availability of alternatives to buyers | Cellophane |
| Cases: Price fixing by demand restrictions | Nat'l Macaroni |
| Cases: Price fixing "per se" rule is no longer viewed favorably | Texaco |
| Cases: Agreement to an element of a price is still price fixing | Catalano |
| Cases: Agreeing to credit terms is a form of price fixing | Catalano |
| Cases: Rule of Reason test for Price Fixing outlined | Chicago Board of Trade |
| Cases: Creation of Conduct-Structure-Performance Test for price fixing | Gypson |
| Cases: Burden Shifting for Horizontal Restraint | Brown |
| Doctrine: Triggers for Abbreviated/Quick Look Test | People restricting output of something connected to business,Regulation is needed to function at all, D's are professional class with self-regulating function |
| Doctrine: Quick Look Test | P charges one of three classes, D gives pro-competitive reason, P has to give bigger anti-competitive reason. P wins, D loses OR P |
| Cases: Private Party must be direct purchaser | Illinois Brick |
Created by:
5619038
Popular Law sets