click below
click below
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Criminal Law - Invol
Involuntary Manslaughter: Constructive Manslaughter
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| Test for constructive manslaughter | (1) Unlawful Act (2) That is dangerous (3) That causes the death of V |
| Franklin | unlawful act can't be a tort |
| Lowe | unlawful act can't be an omission |
| Lamb | no unlawful act (no assault) |
| Bristow and Others | unlawful act was a burglary + some crimes may become dangerous under alternate circumstnaces? |
| Farnon and Ellis | unlawful act can be criminal damage |
| Church | Outlines dangerous act test |
| Dangerous act test | A reasonable person must foresee the possibility of SOME harm |
| DPP v Newbury and Jones | children didn't foresee possibility of harm, but because the test is objective, they were liable |
| JM and SM | dangerous act test merely requires the foreseeability of some harm (bouncer chase + thin skull rule for aneurysm) |
| Larkin | unlawful act needn't be directed aty V |
| Dawson | Reasonable person doesn't foresee harm (heart attack) |
| Watson | Reasonable person does foresee harm (burgling of known old person) |
| Lewis | no break in the chain of causation, so liable for constructive ms |
| Kennedy | Injecting of heroin that D supplied breaks chain of causation, so not liable for constructive ms |
| mens rea of constructive manslaughter | mens rea of the unlawful act |