click below
click below
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Criminal Law - GenD
General Defences: Duress by threat/circumstances and necessity
Question | Answer |
---|---|
Howe | Duress is not a defence for murder |
Gotts | Duress is not a defence of attempted murder |
Graham Test part 1 | (1) Was D compelled to act from reasonable belief of fear from serious injury or death |
Graham Test part 2 | (2) Would a sober person of reasonable firmness, sharing characteristics of the accused, have reacted in the same way? |
Hasssan | D voluntarily joined a gang (self-induced) and had an avenue of escape (call police when in house) so defence failed |
Graham | Lodger threatens homosexual to help kill his wife. Duress fails as he didn't fear SI/death + reasle person wouldn't have helped |
Cole | D owes loan sharks. Threaten D to get money. D does robbery. Defence fails due to nexus (no link between threat and crime) |
Flatt | Intoxication will negate a mistake as to the threat |
Valderrama-Vega | Court can consider the cumulative effects of numerous threats |
Brandford | Had an avenue of escape so duress couldn't apply |
Bowen | Outlies the characteristics to consider: Age, Gender, Serious physical disability, Mental illness, pregnancy - not low IQ |
What is duress of circumstances? | D is forced to act because of circumstances - no direct threat from a person e.g. fire |
What is the test for duress of circumstnaces | Same as test for duress by threat (Graham test) |
Willer | D surrounded by gang in a car so drove on pavement to escape. Duress applied in defence for reckess driving |
Necessity test | (1) Act done only to avoid inevitable evil (2) evil directed towards D or others D is responsible for (3) act reasonable/proportionate to evil avoided |
Dudley v Stevens | Defence of necessity put forward by sailors who ate the cabin boy to survive but failed |
Re A | Conjoined twins - necessity available as a defence as it was distinguished from dudley (V selected by circumstances not by D) |