Save
Busy. Please wait.
Log in with Clever
or

show password
Forgot Password?

Don't have an account?  Sign up 
Sign up using Clever
or

Username is available taken
show password


Make sure to remember your password. If you forget it there is no way for StudyStack to send you a reset link. You would need to create a new account.
Your email address is only used to allow you to reset your password. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.


Already a StudyStack user? Log In

Reset Password
Enter the associated with your account, and we'll email you a link to reset your password.
focusNode
Didn't know it?
click below
 
Knew it?
click below
Don't Know
Remaining cards (0)
Know
0:00
Embed Code - If you would like this activity on your web page, copy the script below and paste it into your web page.

  Normal Size     Small Size show me how

Evolutionary Biology

Cooperative coevolution

QuestionAnswer
Social behaviours Exchanges take place between an actor and a recipient and can have either positive or negative effects on the two parties
Social behaviours In predatory/parasitic interactions, the actor (predator/parasite) gains fitness and the recipient (prey/host) loses fitness (because it is killed or made ill)
Competitive behaviours The actor (competitor) loses fitness and the recipient (also competitor) loses fitness (because both harm each other)
Mutualistic behaviours The actor (mutualist) gains fitness and the recipient (also mutualist) gains fitness (because both help each other)
Altruistic behaviours The actor (altruist) loses fitness and the recipient (no special name) gains fitness (because the altruist helps the recipient at a cost to the altruist)
Altruism • This is a behaviour that increases another individual’s fitness at a cost to one’s own fitness • On its own, altruism should not evolve because altruistic individuals lower their own fitness
Alarm calls Reduces mortality risk for others + Increases mortality risk for self -
Nest helpers Increases fecundity for others + Decreases fecundity for self -
Social insects Increases fecundity for others + Zero fecundity for self -
Altruism should not evolve. But altruistic behaviours have evolved…how? Short answer: altruistic behaviours only look altruistic (+/-). In reality, altruistic behaviours are mutualistic (+/+)
Kin selection – natural selection can favour altruistic behaviour between kin e.g. Florida scrub jay
Reciprocity – “You scratch my back, I’ll scratch yours”
Nest helping increases fecundity for parents + Nest helping increase fitness for self through (1) additional siblings, (2) practice rearing offspring, and (3) increased probability of inheriting parents’ territory +
Allogrooming reduces parasite load for others + Allogrooming reduces parasite load for self (when reciprocated in the future) + Requires memory and individual recognition “I will help those who have helped me (or others) before”
Mutualism • Two different species: each species incurs a cost to benefit the other species • Often with animal/plant on one side and a microorganism on the other (bacteria, virus, fungi)
ie. Bobtail squid • Squid provides food and housing (at a cost) to Vibrio fischeri bacteria • Bacteria glow (at a cost) • The glow lets the squid counter-illuminate the moon shadow, to avoid predation
ie. Upside-down jellyfish • Jellyfish provides housing to algae • Algae give up some of their photosynthetic product to the jellyfish
Mutualism - cheating • Imagine you have two kinds of individual on one side of a mutualism (helpers and cheaters) • The helper will have a lower fitness to the cheater, and the cheater genotype will go to fixation
Mutualism - cheating • Kin selection cannot select for mutualism between different species • Reciprocity cannot select for mutualism when there is no individual recognition and memory
Trophic mutualism • Partners specialised in obtaining energy and nutrients • E.g. Rhizobium and plant roots that form nitrogen fixing root nodules in exchange for sugars • Cellulose digesting bacteria in the rumens of cows
Defensive mutualism Involve species that receive food or shelter from their partner in return for a defensive function • E.g. ants and antplants
Dispersal mutualism • Involve animals that transport either: • Pollen in return for nectar • Seed in return for a fruit reward
Leafcutter ant-fungus mutualism • Ants cut leaves and feed leaf fragments to a specialised fungus • Fungus digests the leaves and makes food to feed ant larvae - essentially the ants are fungus farmers
Leafcutter ant-fungus mutualism • Different ant colonies keep different fungi • Fungus is vertically transmitted • i.e. the fungal cultivar is passed down through the generations of ant colonies
Leafcutter ant-fungus mutualism • This creates an opportunity for parasites: Escovopsis mould A) is a healthy attine garden B) attine garden attacked by Escovopsis
So how to control the mould parasite? • Ants host bacteria that produce antibiotics and protect the ant and the fungus
Co-evolution of Pseudonocardia and Escovopsis - explanation? • Pseudonocardia (bacteria): constantly evolving more effective compounds to kill Escovopsis • Escovopsis (mould): constantly evolving resistance to antibiotics
Competing symbiosis models:1) Vertical transmission One coevolved species: Pseudonocardia evolving in arms-race (Red Queen) fashion against Escovopsis
2) Horizontal transmission • Ant “recruits” many useful species of bacteria from the soil • No need for an arms race, but how does the ant selectively recruit useful bacteria, since most bacteria don’t make antibiotics?
Testing vertical transmission • Phylogenetics • If specific Pseudonocardia species are passed down from colony to colony, we would expect that Pseudonocardia will speciate when their leafcutter ant hosts speciate. • The phylogenies should match, showing co-speciation
Conclusion Cafaro et al. concluded that some Pseudonocardia species have been recruited from the soil and passed down the generations and co-diversified and coevolved with the attine ants
Conclusion Vertical transmission is a viable explanation for Pseudonocardia, but probably not the only explanation
Conclusion Worsley et al. show that vertical transmission model and the horizontal transmission model can work together to produce a microbiome of antibiotic-producing bacteria, which solves the problem of maintaining effective antibiotics against Escovopsis
Created by: reub8n
Popular Biology sets

 

 



Voices

Use these flashcards to help memorize information. Look at the large card and try to recall what is on the other side. Then click the card to flip it. If you knew the answer, click the green Know box. Otherwise, click the red Don't know box.

When you've placed seven or more cards in the Don't know box, click "retry" to try those cards again.

If you've accidentally put the card in the wrong box, just click on the card to take it out of the box.

You can also use your keyboard to move the cards as follows:

If you are logged in to your account, this website will remember which cards you know and don't know so that they are in the same box the next time you log in.

When you need a break, try one of the other activities listed below the flashcards like Matching, Snowman, or Hungry Bug. Although it may feel like you're playing a game, your brain is still making more connections with the information to help you out.

To see how well you know the information, try the Quiz or Test activity.

Pass complete!
"Know" box contains:
Time elapsed:
Retries:
restart all cards