Busy. Please wait.

show password
Forgot Password?

Don't have an account?  Sign up 

Username is available taken
show password


Make sure to remember your password. If you forget it there is no way for StudyStack to send you a reset link. You would need to create a new account.
We do not share your email address with others. It is only used to allow you to reset your password. For details read our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Already a StudyStack user? Log In

Reset Password
Enter the associated with your account, and we'll email you a link to reset your password.
Don't know
remaining cards
To flip the current card, click it or press the Spacebar key.  To move the current card to one of the three colored boxes, click on the box.  You may also press the UP ARROW key to move the card to the "Know" box, the DOWN ARROW key to move the card to the "Don't know" box, or the RIGHT ARROW key to move the card to the Remaining box.  You may also click on the card displayed in any of the three boxes to bring that card back to the center.

Pass complete!

"Know" box contains:
Time elapsed:
restart all cards
Embed Code - If you would like this activity on your web page, copy the script below and paste it into your web page.

  Normal Size     Small Size show me how

AP Gov


1.Struck down state sponsored prayer in public schools.2. Ruled that the Regents' prayer was an unconstitutional violation of the Establishment Clause. ENGEL V. VITALE (1962)
1.Struck dow state funding for private regligous schools.2. Ruled that state aid to church-related schools must meet three tests: LEMON V. KURTZMAN (1971)
1.Banned polygamy2.Distinguihed between religous belief that are protected by the Free Exercise Clause and religous practices that may be restricted.3.Ruled that religous practices cannot make an act legal that would otherwise be illegal. REYNOLDS V. UNITED STATES (1879)
1. Banned the used of illegal drugs in religous ceremonies.2. Ruled that the government can act when religous practices violate criminal laws. OREGON V. SMITH (1990)
1. Ruled that free speech could be limited when it presents a "clear and present danger...."2.Established the "clear and present danger" test to define conditions under which public authorities can limit free speech. SCHENCK V. UNITED STATES (1919)
1.Ruled that public official cannot win a suit for defamation unless the statement is made with "actual malice."2.Established that "actual malice" standard to promote "uninhibited, robust and wide-open" public debate. NEW YORK TIMES V. SULLIVAN (1964)
1.Ruled that obscenity is not constitutionally protected free speech.2.Created the "prevailing community standards" rule requiring consideration of the work as a whole. ROTH V. UNITED STATES (1951)
1.Protected some forms of symbolic speech.2.Ruled that students do not "shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate". TINKER V. DES MOINES INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT (1969)
1.Ruled that flag burning is a form of symbolic speech protect by the First Amendment TEXAS V. JOHNSON (1989)
Created by: devin12