click below
click below
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Plant bio
Plant/pathogen interactions
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| Why are most plants resistant to most pathogens? | • High biodiversity • Plant pathogen co-evolution • Isolation of disease through natural barriers • Changing environmental conditions |
| Why in agricultural settings are plants more prone to disease? | • Low biodiversity (monocultures) • No co-evolution between plant and pathogen • No isolation through natural barriers • Human-altered environmental conditions |
| What organisms cause plant disease? | Fungi Nematodes Oomycetes Viruses Bacteria |
| What's the biggest problem? | Major crop loss |
| Which diseases cause crop loss? | Blast disease/smut disease (fungus) |
| The disease triangle predicts the likelihood of disease occurring | Plants are exposed to countless microbes, but few of these interactions lead to disease - why? - host must be susceptible - pathogen can avoid host defences - environment must favour the pathogen |
| What factors reduce the likelihood of disease? | Resistant plants, little/no pathogens and a non-conductive environment |
| What is plant immunity based upon? | - pathogen recognition and defence - no adaptive immunity in plants |
| What are the parts of the plant immune system? | First branch: defenses outside of the plant cell Second branch: defenses inside of the plant cell |
| First branch | Pattern-Triggered immunity (PTI) recognizes pathogens outside of the plant cell MAMPs/DAMPs are pathogen molecules which are detected by PRRs Plant cell surface receptors (PRRs) detect pathogen presence |
| Many plant PRR extracellular receptors have three domains | 1) extracellular leucine-rich repeat domain that recognizes conserved microbial elements 2) a transmembrane domain 3) intracellular kinase domain |
| MAMPs are recognized by specific PRRs | ie. FLS2 - flagellin |
| Plants respond to pathogens with large-scale transcriptional changes | Defence responses include: • Increased synthesis of stress hormones • Synthesis of antimicrobial compounds • Production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) • Production of callose |
| Biotechnology and plant PRRs in disease resistance breeding | The PRR EFR is not present in tomato EFR confers resistance to bacterial blight Introducing EFR from Arabidopsis (another plant) into tomato confers resistance to bacterial blight |
| Second branch | - ETI (effector triggered immunity) |
| Pathogens produce effectors that enhance their virulence | • Effectors are small molecules secreted by pathogens, that facilitate infection and colonization of the host plant • Effectors can be proteins, small RNAs, or other types of molecules, and they often target specific host proteins or cellular processes |
| NLRs – intracellular immune receptor which recognize pathogen effectors | - NLRs recognize effectors intracellularly Defense responses include: • Calcium ion influx • Production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) |
| Plant NLRs typically consist of three domains | - signal transduction ie. TIR - ON/OFF switch ie. NB-ARC - pathogen recognition ie. LRR |
| Active NLRs can form "resistosomes" which result in Calcium influx and cell death | pathogen effectors - NLR activation - resistosome formatin |
| Biotechnology and plant NLRs in disease resistance breeding | NLR from wild potato confers resistance to late blight in cultivated potato NLR- = no growth NLR+ = growth |
| Zig zag model | Pathogen MAMPs are recognized by PRRs PTI - (first branch) Pathogen effectors suppress defence response Pathogen effectors are recognized by plant NLRs ETI - (second branch) |
| Red queen hypothesis | Species must constantly adapt and co-evolve to remain competitive |
| Intracellular NLRs | - highly diverse immune system components - highly variable across all plants - many genomic events contribute to the high variability of NLRs |
| Too much diversity in immune receptors? | - can result in plant autoimmunity and mismatching immune receptors |