click below
click below
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Law Making 3
Statutory Interpretation
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| HRMC | Involved in cases against McVities and M&S |
| Bassett | Voyeurism case |
| Cheeseman | Case where 'passengers' had to be interpreted |
| Literal rule | Give words their 'ordinary' meaning |
| Golden rule | Used where a word has 2 meanings or to avoid a 'repugnant' outcome |
| Mischief rule | Rule used in Smith v Hughes |
| Whiteley v Chappell | Voting 'fraud' was lawful |
| LNER v Berriman | Literal rule gave an unjust outcome to widow |
| Purposive | Approach favoured by Lord Denning and in European law |
| Adler v George | Golden rule used to interpret 'vicinity' |
| Re Sigsworth | Golden rule used to avoid a repugnant outcome |
| Professor Zander | Described the golden rule as 'a feeble parachute' |
| Lord Esher | Said that the literal rule should be used 'even where it leads to a manifest absurdity' |
| Heydon's case | Case from 1584 that established the mischief rule |
| RCN v DHSS | Case where the purposive approach was used to interpret 'medical practitioner' |
| Interpretation Act 1978 | Statute that helps with interpretation |
| DPP v Chivers | Case where the Interpretation Act 1978 was used |
| Pepper v Hart | Case that allowed Hansard's use as an extrinsic aid |
| Laroche v Spirit of Adventure | Case where 3 extrinsic aids were used to interpret 'aircraft' |
| Jones v Wrotham Park | Restated the mischief rule |