click below
click below
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Crime 7
General Defences
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| Intoxication | More likely to provide a defence to crimes of specific intent |
| Insanity | Defined by M'Naghten Rules |
| Bratty | Epilepsy = insanity (Denning) |
| Burgess | Sleepwalker - attack with VCR! |
| Windle | 'I suppose they will hang me for this' |
| Kingston | Involuntary intoxication but no defence as he had MR |
| R v T | Rape causing PTSD = external factor |
| Hardie | Vallium wardrobe guy |
| Quick | Diabetic nurse - automatism |
| Hennessy | Diabetic driver - insanity |
| Majewski | Outlines rules on intoxication |
| Lipman | Intoxication successful defence to murder |
| AG's Ref #2 of 92 | D must lose control completely to plead automatism |
| Clarke | Insanity does not include absent-mindedness |
| Gallagher | 'Dutch courage' = no defence |
| Hatton/O'Grady | Intoxicated mistake is no excuse in self-defence |
| Allen | Home-made wine - still voluntary intoxication |
| Barnes | Sports + consent |
| Aitken | RAF case - rough horseplay |
| Jones | Throwing in air - rough horseplay |
| Leach | Crucifixion - dangerous exhibition? |
| Dica | HIV transmission - not informed consent |
| Wilson | Branding - body adornment |
| Brown/Emmett | Intentional infliction of pain/injury unlikely to become lawful because of consent |
| Pretty | Consent is no defence to murder |
| Martin | Unreasonable force in defence of home |
| Buckley | Relative size and strength may be taken into account in self defence |
| Rashford/Keane | If D was the initial aggressor, self-defence MAY still succeed |
| Bird | Failure to retreat won't automatically preclude self-defence |
| Oye | Delusional belief in a threat won't be acceptable for self defence |
| Beckford | Pre-emptive strike in self defence is acceptable |
| Palmer | D needn't 'weigh to a nicety' his response to a threat |
| Duress by threats | D was forced to commit crime by threat of death or serious harm |
| Duress of circumstances | D was forced to commit a crime by circumstances presenting a threat of death or serious harm |
| Necessity | Similar to duress of circumstances but possibly available for murder? |
| Howe | Duress not accepted as defence to murder |
| Dudley & Stephens | Necessity failed as defence - shipwreck |
| Re A | Necessity discussed in case about conjoined twins |
| Willer | Duress of circumstances case - reckless driving |
| Gotts | Duress not a defence to attempted murder |
| Hasan | Duress not available to those associating with violent people or if threat is not imminent |
| Shepherd | Duress was available where gang were not initially violent |
| Bowen | D's low IQ could not be taken into account in duress test |
| Wilson | Duress no defence to murder by 13 year old |
| Graham | Sets out test for duress |
| Cole | In duress there must be nexus between crime and instruction |
| Collins | Illustrates 'householder' rule in self-defence |
| Williams (Gladstone) | Genuine, but mistaken belief that force was necessary |
| R v B&M | Body modification case |
| AG v Whelan | Duress case where the defence succeeded! |
| Valderrama-Vega | Threat must be of violence |
| Hobday | Cutting initials = ABH |