Busy. Please wait.
or

show password
Forgot Password?

Don't have an account?  Sign up 
or

Username is available taken
show password

why


Make sure to remember your password. If you forget it there is no way for StudyStack to send you a reset link. You would need to create a new account.
We do not share your email address with others. It is only used to allow you to reset your password. For details read our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.


Already a StudyStack user? Log In

Reset Password
Enter the associated with your account, and we'll email you a link to reset your password.

Remove ads
Don't know
Know
remaining cards
Save
0:01
To flip the current card, click it or press the Spacebar key.  To move the current card to one of the three colored boxes, click on the box.  You may also press the UP ARROW key to move the card to the "Know" box, the DOWN ARROW key to move the card to the "Don't know" box, or the RIGHT ARROW key to move the card to the Remaining box.  You may also click on the card displayed in any of the three boxes to bring that card back to the center.

Pass complete!

"Know" box contains:
Time elapsed:
Retries:
restart all cards




share
Embed Code - If you would like this activity on your web page, copy the script below and paste it into your web page.

  Normal Size     Small Size show me how

Law Making 4

Judicial Precedent

TermDefinition
Donoghue v Stevenson HL established the principle that a manufacturer owes a consumer a duty of care
R v R Marital rape case - HL changed outdated law & followed CA's reasoning
R v Gotts Attempted murder - followed obiter from R v Howe
DPP v Smith ABH Ponytail - original precedent
R v Davis Anonymous witness rule - overruled by statute
London St Tramways v LCC HL bound by itself from 1898
Austin v Mayor of Southwark Practice Statement applies to Supreme Court
Herrington v BRB Duty owed to trespassers - overruled Addie v Dumbreck
R v Shivpuri Overruled Anderton v Ryan - attempts
R v G & R Overruled R v Caldwell - recklessness
Broome v Cassell Lord Denning ignored precedent from HL
Schorsch Meir Denning ignored Havana Railways but case not appealed to HL
Miliangos Denning ignored Havana Railways. HL agreed with argument but said CA should follow HL precedent
Young v Bristol Aeroplane 3 scenarios where CA can avoid its own precedents
Rickards v Rickards CA ignores precedent set per incuriam
Davis v Johnson HL approved Young v Bristol Aeroplane
Gould CA criminal division has more flexibility
Willers v Joyce Privy Council may now bind/overrule English courts
Balfour v Balfour Distinguished in Merritt v Merritt
Created by: Mr Lovell