click below
click below
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Courts MC Test
Question | Answer |
---|---|
1) 1b. What did the framers of the Constitution do on purpose? | Insulated federal judges from the influence of public opinion. |
1) 5c. What is true of the "vast majority of criminal and civil cases?" | Involve state law and are tried in state courts. |
1) 10a. Amicus curiae means what? | friend of the court |
1) 10b. What do amicus curiae briefs do and how are they used by interest groups? | Influence a court's decision by raising additional points of view and presenting information not contained in the briefs of the formal parties. |
1) 10c. Amicus curiae briefs always come from where? | Outside of the court (friends of the court, interest groups, etc.) |
2) 1a. How was the SC created? | The Constitution specified that there would be a SC. |
2)1b. How were the "lower federal courts" created? | It was left up to Congress, who in 1789 created the lower federal courts |
2) 2. What are the three "levels" of the federal or "constitutional" courts? | district, courts of appeals, and the SC |
2) 3. Contrast original and appellate jurisdiction. | Original - hear a case first and determine the facts about a case (90%). Appellate - hear cases brought to them on appeal from a lower court. Do not review the factual record, only the legal issues involved. |
2) 4c. What is their (district courts) jurisdiction (original or appellate)? | original |
2) 4d. They (district courts) are the only federal courts which do what two things? | hold trials and impanel judges |
2) 5b. How do most federal criminal cases end? | Many don't have a trial, and most enter guilty pleas as part of a bargain to receive a lighter punishment |
2) 8e. What is the jurisdiction of the courts of appeals (original or appellate); what do they not do? | appellate; they do not hold trials or hear testimony |
3) 2a. How is the number of SC justices determined? | Congress decides |
3) 3. "Unlike other federal courts," what is true of the SC? | it decides what cases it will hear |
3) 4a. Provide the two general circumstances under which the SC has original jurisdiction. | foreign diplomats and involving a state (state v. gov., state v. state, state v. citizens of another state, or state v. foreign country). |
3) 4b. Is the above common or rare (when SC has original jurisdiction)? | rare |
3) 4c. Where does "almost all" of the Court's business come from? | The appellate process |
3) 5a. Why are federal judges and justices so important to presidents? | Lets them leave a mark on the American legal system. |
3) 5b. What are federal judges and justices guaranteed by the Constitution? | The right to serve "during good behavior" or for life |
3) 5c. Can federal justices and judges be removed? | Yes by conviction of impeachment |
3) 5d. How else are federal judges and justices protected from political pressure? | Congress cannot reduce their salaries/they are not elected |
3) 6a. How is the president's discretion somewhat limited? | The Senate must confirm each nomination by majority vote |
3) 6b. Provide the two constitutional steps to become a federal judge or justice | Nominated by the president then confirmed by the Senate |
3) 9b. What is the role of the Senate Judiciary Committee? | Probes a nominee's judicial philosophy in great detail |
4) 3. Explain the connection between partisanship and SC nominations. | Only 13 of 112 members of the SC have been nominated by presidents of a different party. Presidents will nominate with their party |
4) 4a. Why is ideology so important to presidents in nominating judges/justices? | Want people who share their views, so they "pack" the courts wanting more than just "justice", but policies they agree with. |
4) 4b. How can presidents check the ideology of nominees? | Their aides survey candidates' decisions (if they have served on a lower court), speeches, political stands, writings, and other expressions of opinion. |
4) 7. How has political party tended to influence the decision made by judges? | Republican judges in general are somewhat more conservative than are Democratic judges. |
4) 8a. Approximately how many cases are submitted annually to the SC? | 8000 |
4) 8b. How many cases does the SC generally hear? | <100 |
4) 9. Explain the rule of four. | If four justices agree to grant review of a case, it is placed on the docket and scheduled for oral argument. |
4) 10b. What is its role in the process of the SC accepting a case? | Sometimes the Court will decide a case on the basis of the written record already on file with the Court. |
5) 4a. Define stare decisis | A Latin phrase meaning "let the decision stand" Most cases reaching appellate courts are settled on this principle. Means that an earlier decision should hold for the case being considered. |
5) 4b. What is true of its (stare decisis) role in court decisions? | Judges and justices settle the vast majority of cases on this principle |
5) 7a. Describe the theories of original intent/meaning. | Interpretation of written Const. or law should be consistent with that was meant by those who drafted and ratified it |
6) 3b. Define judicial review. | The power of the courts to determine whether acts of Congress and, by implication, the executive are in accord with the US Constitution. |
6) 3c.What case established judicial review? | Marbury v. Madison |
6) 4. How does judicial review give the judicial branch power, with regards to the other two branches? | Can strike down an act from Congress if it is not constitutional, and can make sure the executive is in accord with the Constitution. |
6) 6a. Provide four ways the Warren Court was very active in shaping policy. | segregation of public schools - unconstitutional, + rights of criminal defendants, + right to counsel & protections against unreasonable s&s & self-incrimination. States to reappotrtion their legislatures and it prohibited organized prayer in schools. |
6) 6b. What was the conservative response to the Warren Court? | Put billboards up around the US urging Congress to "Impeach Earl Warren" |
6) 7a. What was decided in Roe v. Wade (1973)? | Abortion was constitutional |
6) 7c. Who was the chief justice during these decisions? | Warren E. Burger |
7) 2a. Provide three ways the federal courts aren't very democratic. | Federal judges are not elected and are almost impossible to remove |
7) 5b. Define judicial restraint including who the courts should defer to. | An approach to decision making in which judges play minimal policymaking role and defer to legislatures whenever possible |
7) 6a. Define judicial activism. | An approach to decision making in which judges sometimes make bold policy decisions, even charting new constitutional ground |
7) 6b. Provide one argument of its advocates | Emphasize the courts may alleviate pressing needs-especially needs of those who are politically or eco. weak - left unmet by the majoritarian political process. |
8) 2. How can both the executive and legislative branch control activist courts through the nomination process? | President and the Senate determine who sits on the federal bench |
8) 3a. How can the amendment process control activist courts? | Congress, with or without the president's urging, can begin the process of amending the Constitution to overcome a constitutional decision of the SC |
8) 4a. With its ability to create/abolish lower federal courts, how can Congress strongly influence the courts and their decisions? | It can alter the appellate jurisdiction of the SC to prevent it from hearing a case. |
8) 5a. How can Congress use its ability to make laws to influence court decisions that have already been made? | They pass legislation that clarifies existing laws to overturn the courts. |