click below
click below
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Negligence
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| Blythe v Birmingham (pipe) | Defined negligence as reasonable man |
| Donoghue v Stevenson (snail) | Modern law of negligence and neighbour test |
| Caparo v Dickman (shares) | Created Caparo Test |
| Kent v Griffiths | Ambulance delayed - foreseeable |
| Bourhill v Young | Pregnant fishwife - not foreseeable |
| Haley v London Electricity Board | Trench in path - foreseeable |
| Roe v Ministry of Health | Anaesthetic contaminated - not foreseeable |
| Bourhill v Young | Pregnant fishwife - no proximity |
| McLoughlin v O'Brian | Family car crash - proximity in relationship |
| Home Office v Dorset Yacht Co Ltd. | Young offendors crash - proximity |
| MPC v Reeves | Lynch on suicide watch - reasonable |
| Orange v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire | Orange not suicide risk - not reasonable |
| Vellino v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester | Jumped out of window - not reasonable |
| Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire | Final victim of Yorkshire Ripper - not reasonable |
| Mitchell v Glasgow City Council | Killed after long dispute - not reasonable |