Busy. Please wait.

show password
Forgot Password?

Don't have an account?  Sign up 

Username is available taken
show password


Make sure to remember your password. If you forget it there is no way for StudyStack to send you a reset link. You would need to create a new account.
We do not share your email address with others. It is only used to allow you to reset your password. For details read our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Already a StudyStack user? Log In

Reset Password
Enter the associated with your account, and we'll email you a link to reset your password.
Don't know
remaining cards
To flip the current card, click it or press the Spacebar key.  To move the current card to one of the three colored boxes, click on the box.  You may also press the UP ARROW key to move the card to the "Know" box, the DOWN ARROW key to move the card to the "Don't know" box, or the RIGHT ARROW key to move the card to the Remaining box.  You may also click on the card displayed in any of the three boxes to bring that card back to the center.

Pass complete!

"Know" box contains:
Time elapsed:
restart all cards
Embed Code - If you would like this activity on your web page, copy the script below and paste it into your web page.

  Normal Size     Small Size show me how

AS Politics


What is Judicial review? - court proceeding - judges lawfulness of public body's actions - does not affect whether decision was 'right', more concerned protocol was followed - grounds for action (illegality, irrationality, breach of HRA or EU law)
What are the grounds of judicial review? - illegality - procedural impropriety - irrationality - HRA breach - EU Law breach
Why has there been an increase in judicial review? Was made easier for citizens to bring public bodies to court in the 1980s
Why is there an increase in tension between the Gvmt and Judiciary? - J can dis-apply legislation which contravenes EU Law - Can issue declaration of incompatibility for UK Law which contradicts HRA
Outline changes made by the Constitutional Reform Act 2005 - Lord Chancellor merged with Secretary for Justice, ceremonial role now - Supreme Court established highest appeal court- 2009 - Appointments made through independent, meritocratic body - New Lord Chief Justice, independent, represents J in Gvmt
Does it matter that individual judges and the judiciary are collectively criticised by Government ministers? YES - Gvmt fails to understand what the role of J is: they have to interpret and apply acts to uphold laws created by Parliament - Reduces public trust in Gvmt and J and the rule of law, criticism just makes the system weaker
Who are the judiciary? - System of judges, courts and the jury when required - uphold the law - decide on appropriate sentences for criminals - head up enquiries (ie. Hutton enquiry) - advise amendments to statute law
Give reasons for why the judiciary is independent - Independent Judicial Appointments Committee, meritocratic - Judges pay comes from independent body - Gvmt cannot interfere in court cases - Lord Chancellor is mainly symbolic role
Give reasons for why the judiciary is NOT independent - Position of Lord Chancellor still exists - Justice Secretary can pardon criminals, officially appoints the judges (on advice), can veto - MPs free to criticise judiciary - Judges are just old law lords - Parliament is sovereign (could interfere)
Why do the judiciary need to be independent? - Only make decisions according to the law - Gives impartial persepctive - Allows fair trial - retains our democracy - keeps faith in the system
Created by: bethysav