Busy. Please wait.
Log in with Clever

show password
Forgot Password?

Don't have an account?  Sign up 
Sign up using Clever

Username is available taken
show password

Make sure to remember your password. If you forget it there is no way for StudyStack to send you a reset link. You would need to create a new account.
Your email address is only used to allow you to reset your password. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Already a StudyStack user? Log In

Reset Password
Enter the associated with your account, and we'll email you a link to reset your password.
Didn't know it?
click below
Knew it?
click below
Don't Know
Remaining cards (0)
Embed Code - If you would like this activity on your web page, copy the script below and paste it into your web page.

  Normal Size     Small Size show me how

Land Use Planning

Land use regulation- law school

What are the goals of land use planning to distribute justice be efficient in maximizing property values aestheic regulation communitarian basis of affecting how people interact
Doctrinal basics of zoning Under the doctrinal implications of the Village of Euclid, the court held that zoning on its face was constitutional under the 14th amendment if there is a legitimate state interest that is rationally related
what is the wisdom of separating commercial from residential uses? controlling noise and aesthetics controlling type of retail risk aversion providing advance notice
What is suburban sprawl it is the shape certain land use takes functionally- 4 type of land use types: residential, retail, places to work, and institutions aesthetically- highbrow elitism and setbacks
Positive and Negative consequenses of suburban sprawl negative: environmental, quality of life, gentrification, and social patterns positive: quality of life, social, and choice
Structure of Zoning Law zoning regulation is done at the local level, delegated by the state into zoning enabling acts zoning ordinances variances special exceptions incentive zoning transferable development rights performance zoning accessory uses nonconforming uses
Regulating Large developments floating zones subdivision regulation site plan review aesthetic regulation historic preservation
Developer Challenges to Municipal exceeding power municipalities can exceed their powers by excercising a power that has been preempted by the state or by attempting to excercise a power the state has not delegated to it
What is the extent of municipality's delegated powers? assesments taxes exactions and impact fees
unlawful exactions need to have a raitonal nexus between the needs and the demands you are making- necessity standard specifically and uniquely attributable to activity
vested rights vested rights under regulations in effect at acertain time only having it build and in operation gives a vested right. unless acquire vested right by substantial expenditures in reliance(must be legal) and not in bad faith (improper purpose exists)
zoning estoppel v vested rights vested rights can be lost by abandonment + evidence or discontinuance estoppel is on the city, not focusing on what developer did but the citys actions that induced reliance or change so are estopped from denying change
developer challenges takings clause under the 5th amendment susbtantive due process looks at the fitness between the ends being pursued and the means to get there
takings clause when the govt acts in public safety to protect people fom causing harm and does not have to compensate for harm because cant pay for everything under penn central pennsylvania coal per se and exactions
zoning enabling act zoning enabling acts authorize the enactment of ordinances first step is coming up with a comprehensive plan
zoning ordinances division into districts under use restrictions area restrictions height restrictions due to the euclidian zoning categories and often involve unfavorable zoning to landowners such as variances, special exceptions, administrative appeal, and rezoning
variances waiver of the application of the terms of an ordinance and is authorized in an ordinance for undue hardship, practical difficulty, or unnecessary hardship helps inject flexibility
special exceptions Another tool for increasing flexibility is a use which will be permitted in a use district if certain criteria already set up in the regulations is met. advantage:protects applicant from arbitrary and capricious decisions and prevents discrimination
incentive zoning permits developers to exceed normal zoning limits in exchange for including certain special amenitites as part of the development project
transferable development rights gives owners of restricted land the power to exceed development restrictions on other parcels (sending/receiving parcels)
performance zoning require minimizing impact of activities on neighbors, community, ecological systems to permit greater flexibility to actual use the landowner makes of land
accessory uses uses that would not be permitted by themselves but which are permitted in conjunction with the permitted principal use of the parcel must aid or contribute to the principal in some way that is clearly, customarily, and incidentally subordinate permitted
nonconforming uses incorporates vested rights and takings. is any lawfully existing use of a structure or of land that does not conform to the use regulation in which located establish that before ordinance was lawful then became non-permitted
unnecessary hardship--variances 3 elements: being uniquely affected by implementation of ordinance, not left a reasonable number of uses because of ordinance, and if the use is authorized by granting a variance will not adversely affect the surrounding neighborhood.
types of variances area: requires proof of practical difficulties use: requires unnecessary hardship
special exception v. variance special exception is legislatively permitted in a zone subject to contol whereas a variance is legislatively prohibited
floating zones special detailed use district of undetermined location in which the proposed kind, size, and form must be preapproved and eventually located if specified standards are met and application is not unreasonable. floats over where it may eventually be
subdivision regulation a typical subdivision review process involves 3 steps sketch plan: broad brush: informal meeting to sketch map preliminary plat approval:biggie:precise details of boundries and layout, etc. final plat: automatic: sent to city council for approval
site plan review aims t control externalities associated with large projects
aesthetic regulation enacting controls designed solely to generate aesthetically pleasing buildings compatible w/ adjacent build relationship to nature proportionate cant be arbitrary and capricious, unless void for vagueness
historic preservation
assesments are city improvements that benefit a few that should pay for it. (city charges) special assesment fees may require an exaction or a dedication then money as an impact fee
taxes when you throw money into a pool and city uses it as they see fit
exactions if its land, dedicate it and exact it
impact fees $$ to be a fee and not a tax there nees to be a special benefit
preemption of municipal powers municipalities can exceed their powers by excercising powers that have been preempted or attempt to exercise powers that have not been delegated to it
state preemption of municipal powers when a developer challenges state law there are two kinds of preemption, state law preempting city and federal preempting state law conflict preemption: higher one will trump complete preemption
extent of municipalities delegated powers before a city can demand an exaction, must show developer has created a problem an need city to help fix it
pennsylvania coal controversial. there was a takings under actual severance home owning surface rights and support land whether the quasi-easement allowed for conceptual severance under a denominator issue. (allows evaluating diminution of value due to regulation)
penn central test is concerned with balancing on an ad hoc basis 1- constitutionality 2-regulator deference, burden of proof on challenger
denominator issue whether we conceptually sever starting from total value of owner rights or surface v. subsurface make the denominator as narrow as possible.
Conceptual severance: is a verbal tool popular among those who want to classify more regulations as takings, by severing property into regulated and unregulated pieces, we decrease denominator of takings fraction and increase extent of diminution in value caused by taking.
4 ad hoc factors that determine whether regulation is a taking 1. Economic impact (per se) 2. Extent to which it interferes with investment backed expectations 3. Character of gov’t action (physical invasion is per se a taking) 4. Interference with Existing Use
Per Se Case: Loretto and Lucas-when there is a total wipe out(lucas), required to show what was taken from landoner was not taken in the first place.
regulatory takings are different than eminent domain and defacto takings
takings base line is penn central (with exceptions) then Taho Sierra when govt. restricts land to deprive you of all value it is per se taking unless just codifying what couldnt do b4
exceptions to takings proscribed use shows interests were not part of title to begin with permitted to assert permanent easement preexisting limitation and duplicates ct result pg 206.....
judicial takings rare. state fucking up own laws
Palazzolo v. Rhode Island a landowner cannot challenge a regulation on a property theyve acquired after knowing regulation is in effect lost because did not argue in L. Ct. that he was severing the land
Moratoria temporary pause button where cannot develop
Tahoe-Sierra preservation v. regional planning agency stresses deprivation of economic viability , establishes category of temporary takings. retroactively temporary-thought permanent but not ex ante temp. moratorium with a sunset sunset to being means do not apply lucas
takings taxonomy eminent domain: formal condemnation/de facto appropriation regulatory takings: penn central-BOP.O., per se- BOP.O., exactions- use logic
cant condition grant of governement permission on certain constitutional waivers bargaining occurs pervasively
Nolan coastal commission conditioning grant of heught increase on use of easement across front beach line. there is no connection between the requests and the uses.
when asking for permit and permit is conditioned must have essential nexus rough proportionality test (to what extent gvt involvement helps problem) and legitimate interest that is substantially related
Dolan commission conditions conveyance for flood control and bike lanes, reasoned related by traffic and transportation and the means-end is proportional to the exaction and harm
money exactions are treated as property exaction: must show impact fee demanded is tied to someone getting permit- nexus and adequate fee (not a tax)
forcing the govt to use eminent domain pg 255-262
Due Process Clause If means infringe on a fundamental (individual) constitutional right, analysis requires compelling state interest substantially related, the higher gov, the narrower the tailoring
united artists theatre v. township of warrington competing theatres being built, was a substantive due process claim: had opportunity to be heard, no corruption, or skipping procedures. has to be deprived of--permit!
discriminatory zoning claims are brought under equal protection and the fair housing act
equal protection clause suspect classes: race, color, creed, national origin. infringing on these is strictly scrutinized under compellint state interest or a rational basis review
class of one claims covered by equal protection saying i was treated differntly as an individual
racial and ethnic minorities covered by race-based claims disparate intent is not enough but may be supportive of anumus toward a group. must prove intent to discriminate. hard to prove, may not be right legal standard
fair housing statute makes it unlawful to refuse to sell/rent, negotiate, or otherwsie make unavailable a dwelling for any person due to race, color, religion,nationality, sex family status handicap
circumstances where conduct that is unintentionally discriminatory will violate the rule community and minority racial groups can show strong discriminatory effect what is interest in taking action complained off (determines deference) is there evidence of discriminatory effect?
sources of discrimination private racial discrimination state action, micro preferences in macro movements (economic analysis)
four factors of disparate impact how strong Ps showing of discriminatory effect discriminatory intent below constitutional standards private v. govtal interest in taking action P compelling D to provide housing for minorities
discrimination based on disability rational basis in justifying
discrimination based on family composition village of belle terre show it is permissible to regulate the use of house by composition (regulating unrelated people living together) but argument is there is a fundamental right for families to live together
Free Speech Claims- are part of expressive land uses sign regulation- susbtantive protections, protecting expressive activity and speech adult regulation- cant regulate if content based
Metromedia v City of San Diego attempted to regulate billboards, held unconstitutioinal to prohibit all noncommercial offsite billboards if its truthful and regulation substantatially/directly advances activity
adult use regulation 1st amendment says cant ban just because think its offensive, freedom of speech issue. can regulate them to industrial areas but must be aimed to dispersing not reducing.
to increase lack of support for proposition that ordinance is directed at secondary effects will succeed challenge studys methodology introduce other studies that cast a doubt on validity conduct new study that casts a doubt on citys study
religious land uses religious freedom causes of action substantial burden (compelling and narrowlly tailored) discrimination and exclusion RLUIPA
Religious uses: is this a religious land use- threshold question what other kinds of land uses are religious is there a substantial burden (there is govt reg that burdens free excercise and is not the least testrictive) pg 360
neighborhood challenges community of landowners and govt dont always agree must have standing must show injury (special damage) is in a zone of interest
neighbor challenges to zoning amendments does it conform to the plan? is it spot zoning? whats the standard of review?
initiative v. referendum initiative: people petition referendum:
standing limiting challenge to govt to those who suffer tangible harm from action. need to be affected more than general public protection form competition is not enough show injury and it is a legally protectable interest
conformity to the plan statutes often required creation of a comprehensive plan that is reviewed
spot zoning usually creates concentrated benefit and disperses negatives. test: size, effect, consistency with plan, is a variance an alternative concerned with arbitrary corruption
how to mitigate risk of spot zoning invalidity for developer text instead of map amendment statement of reasons to justify differential treatment rezone a larger parcel when possible variance
standard of review in a rational basis is related to municipal purposes
neighbor challenges to administrative determinations have standing show harm substantial evidence as SOR to deference
environmental challenges is it subject to environmental review has environmental consequences--may need enviro. study EIS improves decision making, activates political rocess, may involce shaming urban decay and cumulative effects
development problems with exurban subdivision the DRC can approve nonsubstantial variances and upon review can recommend some substantial ones. additional sidewalk example: can be an assessment if not an unlawful exaction as long as they show a nexus
private residential options (fragmentation argument) metro areas are increasingly fragmented it's efficient more citizen representation and involvment
law of municipal formation and fragmented metropolis meet minimum to qualify as a community of interest can contract for those minimums rather easy, study annexation
2 types of interesting externalities when considering metro fragmentations put undesireable land uses around property boundries problem with land uses no one wants
addressing problems of scale in land use decision making getting local government to think regionally standard of review is narrowly tailored compelling state interest dont gentrify
3 stage analysis of scale problems determine region forecast probably effect and duration of restriction substantive due process analysis test lacks teeth
eminent domain taking off private land for public use for a just compensation
Created by: 599842690
Popular Law sets




Use these flashcards to help memorize information. Look at the large card and try to recall what is on the other side. Then click the card to flip it. If you knew the answer, click the green Know box. Otherwise, click the red Don't know box.

When you've placed seven or more cards in the Don't know box, click "retry" to try those cards again.

If you've accidentally put the card in the wrong box, just click on the card to take it out of the box.

You can also use your keyboard to move the cards as follows:

If you are logged in to your account, this website will remember which cards you know and don't know so that they are in the same box the next time you log in.

When you need a break, try one of the other activities listed below the flashcards like Matching, Snowman, or Hungry Bug. Although it may feel like you're playing a game, your brain is still making more connections with the information to help you out.

To see how well you know the information, try the Quiz or Test activity.

Pass complete!
"Know" box contains:
Time elapsed:
restart all cards