Help
Options
Didn't know it?
click below
click below
Knew it?
click below
click below
Don't Know
Remaining cards (0)
Know
retry
shuffle
restart
0:00
Embed Code - If you would like this activity on your web page, copy the script below and paste it into your web page.
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Normal Size Small Size show me how
ChampagneConLawExam3
| Case | Precedent |
|---|---|
| Camps Newfound/ Owatonna, Inc. V. Town of Harrison | Can’t deny a tax exemption for an organization that serves non-residents |
| Granholm v. Heald | Cannot discriminate against out-of state wineries |
| Fletcher v. Peck | Supreme court can rule state laws unconstitutional |
| Dartmouth College v. Woodward | Supreme court upholds the sanctity of private contracts |
| Charles River Bridge v. Warren Bridge Company | Vague contracts interpreted in favor of the states or in the public interest |
| Home Building and Loan Association v. Blaisdell | Temporary halt on foreclosure during a crisis did not violate the contract clause |
| US Trust Company v. NJ | Adjustment of private contracts must be reasonable and appropriate to a public purpose, but the court will defer to legislative judgment. Repeal must be reasonable and necessary |
| Buffalo Teachers Federation v. Tobe | 1. Is the contractual impairment substantial, 2. Does the law serve a legitimate public purpose, 3. Are the means chosen to accomplish the purpose reasonable and necessary |
| The Slaughter-House Cases | Weakens the Privileges and Immunities clause |
| Saenz v. Roe | Discrimination based on state citizenship violates the Privileges & Immunities clause |
| Munn v. Illinois | Public interest doctrine |
| Lochner v. New York | Due process includes your right to contract yourself |
| Muller v. Oregon | Brandeis Brief used for the first time, preservation of women’s health is within a state’s police power |
| Bunting v. Oregon | Brandeis Brief used again, argued successfully that everyone’s work hours can be limited |
| West Coast Hotel Company v. Parrish | Overturns Adkins, minimum wage is constitutional |
| Williamson v. Lee Optical Company | Court decides to stop using substantive due process to strike down state laws |
| State Farm Mutual Automobile Company v. Campbell | Excessive punitive damages are a violation of substantive due process. Ratio of punitive to actual damages no more than 10:1 |
| Caperton v. AT Massey Coal Company | Extreme probability of actual bias that raises a constitutional claim is a violation of due process |
| US v. Carolene Products Company | In social and economic legislation, the court will defer to the legislature |
| Kelo v. City of New London | Economic development is a public use (Texas has a law against this now) |
| Nolan v. California Coastal Commission | Essential nexus test |
| Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council | Total takings test |
| Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency | Regulation of private property from private use does not require compensation |
| Dolan v. City of Tigard | Rough Proportionality |
| Palko v. Connecticut | Theories of incorporation: No incorporation, selective incorporation, total incorporation, selective incorporation plus, total incorporation plus, fair trial |
Created by:
Curtlyn
Popular Law sets