Help
Options
Didn't know it?
click below
click below
Knew it?
click below
click below
Don't Know
Remaining cards (0)
Know
retry
shuffle
restart
0:00
Embed Code - If you would like this activity on your web page, copy the script below and paste it into your web page.
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Normal Size Small Size show me how
ChampagneConLawExam2
| Case | Precedent |
|---|---|
| Hamdi v. Rumsfeld | US Citizens can be detained as enemy combatants |
| Boumedine v. Bush | US has ‘de facto sovereignty’ over Guantanamo Bay |
| Cohens v. Virginia | Supreme court has supremacy even in state law criminal cases |
| Coyle v. Smith | All states should be on “equal footing” |
| Baldwin v. Montana Fish and Game Commission | Limits the power of the Privileges and Immunities clause |
| Dred Scott v. Sandford | African Americans can’t be citizens, so can’t sue |
| New York v. US | The “Take Title” provision exceeds Congress’s Commerce Clause authority |
| Printz v. US | Federal Gov’t cannot draft State Police. Violations of “Unitary Executive Authority” are unconstitutional |
| Alden v. Maine | Supreme court can’t require states to participate in civil suit |
| Tennessee v. Lane | Congress can require states to make reasonable accommodations b/c of due process |
| The Civil Rights Cases | Congress can’t use the 14th amendment to outlaw racial discrimination by private individuals & organizations |
| Jones v. Alfred H Mayer Company | Congress can prohibit private acts of discrimination under the 13th amendment |
| Gibbons v. Ogden | Power to regulate interstate commerce is vested in Congress by the Commerce Clause |
| US v. EC Knight Company | The act of refining (sugar) was a local activity not subject to regulation by congress under interstate commerce |
| Hammer v. Dagenhart | Child labor can’t be regulated under interstate commerce |
| National Labor Relations Board v. Jones and Laughlin Steel Corp | Congress can regulate unions through interstate commerce b/c they’re closely related to interstate commerce |
| Wickard v. Filburn | Cumulative effects test |
| Heart of Atlanta Motel v. US | Commerce clause can be used to make private businesses to obey the Civil Rights Act of 1964 |
| Garcia v. San Antonio Metro Transit Authority | Congress can use the Commerce Clause to enforce minimum wage & overtime pay laws (overturns Usery) |
| US v. Lopez | Congress can’t use commerce clause to regulate handgun carrying, b/c the carrying of handguns didn’t affect the economy on a large scale. |
| Gonzales v. Raich | Congress can criminalize intrastate marijuana b/c cumulative effects on the interstate market (opportunity to overturn Filburn, but didn’t) |
| US v. Butler | State authority to tax can’t be used to accomplish unconstitutional goals |
| US v. Kahriger | States can tax gambling as long as the state collects revenue from the tax. The penalty is a tax in its effect. Tax on bookies didn’t violate the 5th amendment self-incrimination protection (later overturned) |
| South Dakota v. Dole | Federal government has freedom of spending as long as spending power isn’t used for coercion |
| Arizona v. US | When states and the federal gov’t make laws in the same area, fed laws are supreme |
| Cooley v. Board of Wardens | Federal authority under interstate commerce isn’t absolute; states can exercise the authority in some situations |
| Southern Pacific v. Arizona | States can’t make laws that cause a significant burden to interstate commerce |
| National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebalius | Individual mandate was constitutional, Medicare expansion was unconstitutional |
Created by:
Curtlyn
Popular Law sets