CR Question Type ID Word Scramble
|
Embed Code - If you would like this activity on your web page, copy the script below and paste it into your web page.
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Question | Answer |
Bolded font | R - Describe the Role |
Responds to X by | DA - Describe the Argument |
Assumption | FA - Find the Assumption "+" -> "C" | *Negation* |
Assume | FA - Find the Assumption "+" -> "C" | *Negation* |
Required for the conclusion to be more properly drawn... | FA - Find the Assumption "+" -> "C" | *Negation* |
Evaluate | EV - Evaluate the Argument "+" -> "C" | *2 Paths Answer* |
Determine | EV - Evaluate the Argument "+" -> "C" | *2 Paths Answer* |
Useful to know | EV - Evaluate the Argument "+" -> "C" | *2 Paths Answer* |
Important to know | EV - Evaluate the Argument "+" -> "C" | *2 Paths Answer* |
Challenges X by | DA - Describe the Argument |
Strengthens + If True | ST - Strengthen the Argument Answer Supports Arg. |
Supports + If True | ST - Strengthen the Argument Answer Supports Arg. |
Weakens + If True | WK - Weaken the Argument Answer Weakens Arg. |
Undermines + If True | WK - Weaken the Argument Answer Weakens Arg. |
(Argument + Conclusion/Claim), since ____________. | CA - Complete the Argument Find a "+" to Support Given Claim |
(Argument + Conclusion/Claim), because ____________. | CA - Complete the Argument Find a "+" to Support Given Claim |
Flaw | FL - Flaw "+" -> "C" |
Vulnerable to criticism | FL - Flaw "+" -> "C" |
Explain | ED - Explain the Discrepancy "+" -> __why__ <- "+" |
Resolve | ED - Explain the Discrepancy "+" -> __why__ <- "+" |
If True | ST - Strengthen WK - Weaken |
Conclude | INF - Inference Arg. Supports Answer |
Infer | INF - Inference Arg. Supports Answer |
Best supports | INF - Inference Arg. Supports Answer |
Must be true | INF - Inference Arg. Supports Answer |
Implies | INF - Inference Arg. Supports Answer |
Which CR Types have NO CONCLUSION in Question? | ED - Explain the Discrepancy INF - Inference |
(Dialogue)+ *something* is illustrated by _____________. | CA - Complete the Argument Need Concrete Ex. of a "+" from the Arg. |
(Dialogue) + *if some claim is true*, it should be expected ______________. | CA - Complete the Argument Inference: Something that MUST BE TRUE given info in the argument |
(Dialogue) + *in order for some claim to be true*, it must be shown ______________. | CA - Complete the Argument Inference: Something that MUST BE TRUE given info in the argument |
Which of the following most logically completes the argument? | ST - Strengthen Answer Supports Arg. |
Created by:
9378260
Popular GMAT sets