Busy. Please wait.
Log in with Clever
or

show password
Forgot Password?

Don't have an account?  Sign up 
Sign up using Clever
or

Username is available taken
show password


Make sure to remember your password. If you forget it there is no way for StudyStack to send you a reset link. You would need to create a new account.
Your email address is only used to allow you to reset your password. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.


Already a StudyStack user? Log In

Reset Password
Enter the associated with your account, and we'll email you a link to reset your password.

Constitutional Issues

Quiz yourself by thinking what should be in each of the black spaces below before clicking on it to display the answer.
        Help!  

Question
Answer
Coercive confession by an inmate acting under the color of law   Arizona v. Fulminante  
🗑
Court ruled informant was a police actor but the confession was not obtained by coercion or in a police-dominated atmosphere   Illinois v. Perkins  
🗑
Functional equivalent of direct questioning and words or actions that likely lead to an incriminating response requires Miranda   Brewer v. Williams  
🗑
Gun near handicap school; conversation among officer IFO patrol car   Rhode Island v. Innis  
🗑
Gun in grocery store; public safety issue doesn't require Miranda warnings   New York v. Quarrels  
🗑
Right against self-incrimination does not apply to non-testimonial evidence, so no Miranda is required   Pennsylvania v. Muniz  
🗑
Treat silence as a waiver of rights   Berghuis v. Thompkins  
🗑
"Maybe I need a lawyer" is no sufficient to invoke rights - it must be clear an unequivocal   Davis v. United States  
🗑
Invocation of right to silence (and other rights) must be "scrupulously honored"   Michigan v. Mosely  
🗑
A break in Miranda custody lasting more than two weeks is all that is required to re-initiate conversation between the police and defendant   Maryland v. Shatzer  
🗑
post-Miranda confession is only admissible if the Miranda warning and accompanying break are sufficient to give the suspect the reasonable belief that she has the right not to speak with the police   Missouri v. Siebert  
🗑
Cannot interrogate defendant after formal charges have been filed, without Miranda first; call by co-conspirator on behalf of police was interrogation   State v. Dodson  
🗑


   

Review the information in the table. When you are ready to quiz yourself you can hide individual columns or the entire table. Then you can click on the empty cells to reveal the answer. Try to recall what will be displayed before clicking the empty cell.
 
To hide a column, click on the column name.
 
To hide the entire table, click on the "Hide All" button.
 
You may also shuffle the rows of the table by clicking on the "Shuffle" button.
 
Or sort by any of the columns using the down arrow next to any column heading.
If you know all the data on any row, you can temporarily remove it by tapping the trash can to the right of the row.

 
Embed Code - If you would like this activity on your web page, copy the script below and paste it into your web page.

  Normal Size     Small Size show me how
Created by: easytc
Popular Law sets