Upgrade to remove ads
Busy. Please wait.
Log in with Clever
or

show password
Forgot Password?

Don't have an account?  Sign up 
Sign up using Clever
or

Username is available taken
show password


Make sure to remember your password. If you forget it there is no way for StudyStack to send you a reset link. You would need to create a new account.
Your email address is only used to allow you to reset your password. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.


Already a StudyStack user? Log In

Reset Password
Enter the associated with your account, and we'll email you a link to reset your password.

Torts Cases

        Help!  

Case
Principle
Venning v Chin (1974) 10 SASR 299   Affirms the ‘highway rule’ — that in an action in trespass to the person having occurred on the highway, the onus is on the plaintiff to prove either intention or negligence.  
🗑
Williams v Milotin [1957] HCA 83; 97 CLR 465   Affirms negligent trespass in Australian law. Negligent trespass carries the same burden of proof as trespass/intentional tort — ie the plaintiff must prove the facts/directness of the act, and the defendant must prove lack of fault.  
🗑
Smith v Stone (1647) 82 ER 533   Trespass must be by voluntary action.  
🗑
Hutchins v Maughan [1947] VLR 131; [1947] ALR 201   The relationship between the injury suffered and the act must be sufficiently direct.  
🗑
Scott v Shepherd (The Squib Case) [1773] 96 Eng. Rep. 525   Intermediate actions may not negate the immediacy of an act if those actions are taken in the 'agony of the moment'.  
🗑
McNamara v Duncan (1979) 45 FLR 152   In a sporting context, actions outside the rules of the game are not subject to implied consent.  
🗑
Morris v Marsden (1952) 1 ALL ER 925   Motive is unimportant in satisfying an action in trespass.  
🗑
Fagan v Metropolitan Police Commissioner [1969] 1 QB 439   An unintentional action can become intentional.  
🗑
Mickle v Farley [2013] NSWDC 295   In determining damages for defamation, social media's amplification of the 'grapevine effect' may be taken into consideration.  
🗑
Hopper v Reeve (1817) 7 Taunt. 698   Pulling a chair out from beneath a person is sufficiently direct to constitute battery.  
🗑
Ljubic v Armellin [2009] ACTSC 21   Consent is assessed objectively.  
🗑
Rixon v Star City [2001] NSWCA 265   Contact falling within everyday acceptable standards does not constitute battery.  
🗑
Hunter v Canary Wharf [1997] UKHL 14   A proprietary interest is required in order to sue in private nuisance.  
🗑
Myer Stores & Ors v Soo (1991) 2 VR 597   Liability for false imprisonment may arise from having provided the location of or maintaining an interest in the imprisonment.  
🗑
Symes v Mahon [1922] SASR 447   False imprisonment may be by means of psychological coercion. The place of restraint need not be fixed.  
🗑
Hart v Heron [1984] Aust Torts Reports 80–201 (NSWSC)   False imprisonment does not require knowledge of restraint in the plaintiff at the time.  
🗑
Ruddock v Taylor [2003] NSWCA 262   Motive is not an element of false imprisonment.  
🗑
Flewster v Royale (1808) 1 Camp 187   Third parties may be liable for false imprisonment where there is no intermediate discretionary act negating directness.  
🗑
March v E & MH Stramare Pyt Ltd (1991) 171 CLR 506   The but-for test cannot be an exclusive test for causation, and must be supplemented by a 'common sense' approach to the facts of the case.  
🗑
Hackshaw v Shaw (1984) 155 CLR 614   A duty of care can be owed to a trespasser to land where the risk to the trespasser is reasonably foreseeable.  
🗑
Platt v Nutt (1988) 12 NSWLR 231   In an action of trespass, the plaintiff must prove a trespassory act attributable to the defendant.  
🗑
McHale v Watson (1966) 115 CLR 199   In trespass, the onus is on the defendant to prove, on the balance of probabilities, that the trespassory act occurred without the defendant's fault.  
🗑
Bird v Jones (1845) 7 QB 742   For false imprisonment to be proved, restraint must have been total.  
🗑
Balmain New Ferry Co Ltd v Robertson (1906) 4 CLR 379   A person's liberty may be temporarily surrendered under contractual arrangement.  
🗑
Dickinson v Waters Ltd (1931) 31 SR (NSW) 593   False imprisonment must follow directly upon the defendant's act.  
🗑
Sayers v Harlow UDC [1958] 1 WLR 623   Where it follows indirectly from the defendant's act, an imprisonment must cause actual damage in order to support an action for negligence or on the case for intentional, indirect infliction of damage.  
🗑
Slaveski v Victoria [2010] VSC 441   In assault, the requirement of immediacy attaches to the apprehension of contact, not to fear of contact.  
🗑
Zanker v Vartzokas (1988) 34 A Crim R 11   Threats of future harm may constitute assault where the plaintiff is at the mercy of the defendant.  
🗑
Barton v Armstrong [1969] 2 NSWLR 451   Threats made over the phone may constitute assault depending on surrounding circumstances.  
🗑
R v Ireland [1997] QB 114   Silence may be sufficiently threatening to constitute assault.  
🗑
Chief Constable of Thames Valley Police v Hepburn [2002] EWCA Civ 1841   It may constitute assault where a person is obstructed in such a way as to suggest use of force if they continue.  
🗑
New South Wales v Ibbett [2006] HCA 57   Employers may be vicariously liable for exemplary and aggravated damages.  
🗑
Austin v Dowling (1870) LR 5 CP 534   An intermediate discretionary act between the defendant and a third party restraining the plaintiff will break the directness required for vicarious liability in false imprisonment.  
🗑


   

Review the information in the table. When you are ready to quiz yourself you can hide individual columns or the entire table. Then you can click on the empty cells to reveal the answer. Try to recall what will be displayed before clicking the empty cell.
 
To hide a column, click on the column name.
 
To hide the entire table, click on the "Hide All" button.
 
You may also shuffle the rows of the table by clicking on the "Shuffle" button.
 
Or sort by any of the columns using the down arrow next to any column heading.
If you know all the data on any row, you can temporarily remove it by tapping the trash can to the right of the row.

 
Embed Code - If you would like this activity on your web page, copy the script below and paste it into your web page.

  Normal Size     Small Size show me how
Created by: Torts