Torts Cases
Quiz yourself by thinking what should be in
each of the black spaces below before clicking
on it to display the answer.
Help!
|
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Venning v Chin (1974) 10 SASR 299 | show 🗑
|
||||
show | Affirms negligent trespass in Australian law.
Negligent trespass carries the same burden of proof as trespass/intentional tort — ie the plaintiff must prove the facts/directness of the act, and the defendant must prove lack of fault.
🗑
|
||||
show | Trespass must be by voluntary action.
🗑
|
||||
show | The relationship between the injury suffered and the act must be sufficiently direct.
🗑
|
||||
Scott v Shepherd (The Squib Case) [1773] 96 Eng. Rep. 525 | show 🗑
|
||||
show | In a sporting context, actions outside the rules of the game are not subject to implied consent.
🗑
|
||||
Morris v Marsden (1952) 1 ALL ER 925 | show 🗑
|
||||
show | An unintentional action can become intentional.
🗑
|
||||
show | In determining damages for defamation, social media's amplification of the 'grapevine effect' may be taken into consideration.
🗑
|
||||
show | Pulling a chair out from beneath a person is sufficiently direct to constitute battery.
🗑
|
||||
show | Consent is assessed objectively.
🗑
|
||||
show | Contact falling within everyday acceptable standards does not constitute battery.
🗑
|
||||
Hunter v Canary Wharf [1997] UKHL 14 | show 🗑
|
||||
Myer Stores & Ors v Soo (1991) 2 VR 597 | show 🗑
|
||||
Symes v Mahon [1922] SASR 447 | show 🗑
|
||||
Hart v Heron [1984] Aust Torts Reports 80–201 (NSWSC) | show 🗑
|
||||
Ruddock v Taylor [2003] NSWCA 262 | show 🗑
|
||||
Flewster v Royale (1808) 1 Camp 187 | show 🗑
|
||||
March v E & MH Stramare Pyt Ltd (1991) 171 CLR 506 | show 🗑
|
||||
Hackshaw v Shaw (1984) 155 CLR 614 | show 🗑
|
||||
Platt v Nutt (1988) 12 NSWLR 231 | show 🗑
|
||||
McHale v Watson (1966) 115 CLR 199 | show 🗑
|
||||
show | For false imprisonment to be proved, restraint must have been total.
🗑
|
||||
show | A person's liberty may be temporarily surrendered under contractual arrangement.
🗑
|
||||
show | False imprisonment must follow directly upon the defendant's act.
🗑
|
||||
Sayers v Harlow UDC [1958] 1 WLR 623 | show 🗑
|
||||
Slaveski v Victoria [2010] VSC 441 | show 🗑
|
||||
Zanker v Vartzokas (1988) 34 A Crim R 11 | show 🗑
|
||||
show | Threats made over the phone may constitute assault depending on surrounding circumstances.
🗑
|
||||
R v Ireland [1997] QB 114 | show 🗑
|
||||
Chief Constable of Thames Valley Police v Hepburn [2002] EWCA Civ 1841 | show 🗑
|
||||
show | Employers may be vicariously liable for exemplary and aggravated damages.
🗑
|
||||
show | An intermediate discretionary act between the defendant and a third party restraining the plaintiff will break the directness required for vicarious liability in false imprisonment.
🗑
|
Review the information in the table. When you are ready to quiz yourself you can hide individual columns or the entire table. Then you can click on the empty cells to reveal the answer. Try to recall what will be displayed before clicking the empty cell.
To hide a column, click on the column name.
To hide the entire table, click on the "Hide All" button.
You may also shuffle the rows of the table by clicking on the "Shuffle" button.
Or sort by any of the columns using the down arrow next to any column heading.
If you know all the data on any row, you can temporarily remove it by tapping the trash can to the right of the row.
To hide a column, click on the column name.
To hide the entire table, click on the "Hide All" button.
You may also shuffle the rows of the table by clicking on the "Shuffle" button.
Or sort by any of the columns using the down arrow next to any column heading.
If you know all the data on any row, you can temporarily remove it by tapping the trash can to the right of the row.
Embed Code - If you would like this activity on your web page, copy the script below and paste it into your web page.
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Created by:
Torts