Foundations of criminal law & non-fatal offences against the person
Help!
|
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actus Reus | show 🗑
|
||||
Mens Rea | show 🗑
|
||||
Hill v Baxter | show 🗑
|
||||
Pittwood | show 🗑
|
||||
show | Omissions case; police officer (public duty to act)
🗑
|
||||
show | Omissions case; gangrenous aunt (duty after taking responsibility)
🗑
|
||||
show | Omissions case; starved child to death (duty arising from relationship)
🗑
|
||||
Miller | show 🗑
|
||||
White | show 🗑
|
||||
Paggett | show 🗑
|
||||
Blaue | show 🗑
|
||||
Jordan | show 🗑
|
||||
Smith | show 🗑
|
||||
show | Causation case; V jumped out of car during sexual assault
🗑
|
||||
show | Causation case; V jumped out of car during robbery
🗑
|
||||
show | Statutory duty to act
🗑
|
||||
show | Case - definition of intent
🗑
|
||||
show | When D desires an outcome
🗑
|
||||
Indirect/oblique intent | show 🗑
|
||||
Woollin | show 🗑
|
||||
show | Case - test for recklessness (gas meter)
🗑
|
||||
show | Case - recklessness must be subjective (fire)
🗑
|
||||
show | A class of crime that requires no mens rea
🗑
|
||||
show | SL case; selling lottery tickets to underage buyer
🗑
|
||||
show | SL case; supplying drugs without a valid prescription
🗑
|
||||
show | SL case; but on appeal the crime was said to require mens rea
🗑
|
||||
Gammon | show 🗑
|
||||
Contemporaneity | show 🗑
|
||||
show | Case where a 'continuing act' was used to prove contemporaneity
🗑
|
||||
Thabo Meli | show 🗑
|
||||
show | Words or silence can be an assault
🗑
|
||||
Constanza | show 🗑
|
||||
show | Outlines MR of ABH
🗑
|
||||
Mowatt | show 🗑
|
||||
show | Wound must break 2 layers of skin
🗑
|
||||
show | 'Peeping Tom' assault
🗑
|
||||
DPP v K | show 🗑
|
||||
Brown & Stratton | show 🗑
|
||||
Bollam | show 🗑
|
||||
show | ABH can be mental 'harm' and must be more than trivial
🗑
|
||||
DPP v Smith | show 🗑
|
||||
Burstow | show 🗑
|
||||
show | GBH by infection with HIV
🗑
|
||||
Wilson | show 🗑
|
||||
Brown & Others | show 🗑
|
||||
Logdon | show 🗑
|
||||
show | Withdrawing life support will not break the chain of causation
🗑
|
||||
show | Theatre doors - indirect battery
🗑
|
||||
show | Loss of consciousness can = ABH
🗑
|
||||
Miller 1954 | show 🗑
|
||||
Collins v Willcock | show 🗑
|
||||
Venna | show 🗑
|
Review the information in the table. When you are ready to quiz yourself you can hide individual columns or the entire table. Then you can click on the empty cells to reveal the answer. Try to recall what will be displayed before clicking the empty cell.
To hide a column, click on the column name.
To hide the entire table, click on the "Hide All" button.
You may also shuffle the rows of the table by clicking on the "Shuffle" button.
Or sort by any of the columns using the down arrow next to any column heading.
If you know all the data on any row, you can temporarily remove it by tapping the trash can to the right of the row.
To hide a column, click on the column name.
To hide the entire table, click on the "Hide All" button.
You may also shuffle the rows of the table by clicking on the "Shuffle" button.
Or sort by any of the columns using the down arrow next to any column heading.
If you know all the data on any row, you can temporarily remove it by tapping the trash can to the right of the row.
Embed Code - If you would like this activity on your web page, copy the script below and paste it into your web page.
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Created by:
Mr Lovell
Popular Law sets