AICP Certification Case Law and Legal Basis for Planning
Quiz yourself by thinking what should be in
each of the black spaces below before clicking
on it to display the answer.
Help!
|
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| show | 1922 - Takings Case - Restrictions on Use - Justice Holmes wrote in opinion "The general rule...is, that while property maybe regulated to a certain extent, if regulation goes too far it will be recognized as a taking"
🗑
|
||||
| Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co. | show 🗑
|
||||
| Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York City | show 🗑
|
||||
| Agins v. City of Tiburon | show 🗑
|
||||
| Keystone Bituminous Coal Assn. v. DeBenedictis | show 🗑
|
||||
| Nollan v. California Coastal Commission | show 🗑
|
||||
| Dolan v. City of Tigard | show 🗑
|
||||
| show | 1992 - Takings - Expanded Agins test #2 - found a takings when the owner was called upon to sacrifice all economically beneficial uses in the name of the common good.
🗑
|
||||
| show | 1877 - A landmark decision that paved the way for future governmental intervention in private development.
🗑
|
||||
| show | 1909 - The first clear-cut nationwide authority for communities to regulate development of private property through limitation of building heights, and to vary these heights by zone.
🗑
|
||||
| show | 1912 - Setback legislation declared constitutional.
🗑
|
||||
| Hadacheck v. Sebastian | show 🗑
|
||||
| show | 1920 - Made land subdivision regulations possible by holding that dedication of streets as a prerequisite to platting was possible.
🗑
|
||||
| show | An owner may not be denied economically valuable use of his or her land.
🗑
|
||||
| First Prong of the Agins Test | show 🗑
|
||||
| Nexus | show 🗑
|
||||
| show | 1981 - Ordinances that placed tighter restrictions on non-commercial signs than commercial signs violate the 1st Amendment.
🗑
|
||||
| show | 1976 - Communities can zone locations of adult entertainment establishments without violating the 1st Amendment.
🗑
|
||||
| Renton v. Playtime Theaters | show 🗑
|
||||
| show | An assurance that all parties to the proceeding are treated fairly and equally.
🗑
|
||||
| Substantive Due Process | show 🗑
|
||||
| show | 1974 - Upheld power to prohibit more than two unrelated individuals from residing together as a family.
🗑
|
||||
| show | 1972 - Held that communties in growing areas in the way of urban expansion must take their fair share of the region's growth.
🗑
|
||||
| Construction Industry Assoc. or Sonoma County v. Petaluma | show 🗑
|
||||
| show | Upheld conditional development on the provision of services.
🗑
|
||||
| Berman v. Parker | show 🗑
|
||||
| Moore v. East Cleveland | show 🗑
|
||||
| Associated Home Builders v. City of Livermore | show 🗑
|
||||
| 1st English Evangical Luthern Church v. County of Los Angeles | show 🗑
|
Review the information in the table. When you are ready to quiz yourself you can hide individual columns or the entire table. Then you can click on the empty cells to reveal the answer. Try to recall what will be displayed before clicking the empty cell.
To hide a column, click on the column name.
To hide the entire table, click on the "Hide All" button.
You may also shuffle the rows of the table by clicking on the "Shuffle" button.
Or sort by any of the columns using the down arrow next to any column heading.
If you know all the data on any row, you can temporarily remove it by tapping the trash can to the right of the row.
To hide a column, click on the column name.
To hide the entire table, click on the "Hide All" button.
You may also shuffle the rows of the table by clicking on the "Shuffle" button.
Or sort by any of the columns using the down arrow next to any column heading.
If you know all the data on any row, you can temporarily remove it by tapping the trash can to the right of the row.
Embed Code - If you would like this activity on your web page, copy the script below and paste it into your web page.
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Created by:
Joseph.w.baker
Popular Geography sets