Busy. Please wait.
Log in with Clever
or

show password
Forgot Password?

Don't have an account?  Sign up 
Sign up using Clever
or

Username is available taken
show password


Make sure to remember your password. If you forget it there is no way for StudyStack to send you a reset link. You would need to create a new account.
Your email address is only used to allow you to reset your password. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.


Already a StudyStack user? Log In

Reset Password
Enter the associated with your account, and we'll email you a link to reset your password.

Praxis Court Cases for SPED

Quiz yourself by thinking what should be in each of the black spaces below before clicking on it to display the answer.
        Help!  

Question
Answer
Rowley v. Hendrick   (1984) FAPE/ School districts must provide those services that permit a student with disabilities to benefit from instructions  
🗑
Irving Independent School District v. Tatro   (1984) Defining related services/ Clean intermittent catheterization is a related service when necessary to allow a student to stay in school  
🗑
Smith v. Robinson   (1984) Attorney’s fees/ Parents are reimbursed legal fees when they win a case resulting from special education litigation  
🗑
Burlington School Committee v. Department of Education   (1984) Private school places/ in some cases, public schools may be required to pay for private school placements when the district does not provide an appropriate education  
🗑
Honing v. Doe   (1988) exclusion from school- Students whose misbehavior is related to their disability cannot be denied education  
🗑
Timothy W. v. Rochester New Hampshire School District   (1989) FAPE/ Regardless of the existence or severity of a student’s disability, a public education is the right of every child  
🗑
Zobrest b. Catalina Foothills School District   (1993) Paid interpreter at parochial high school/ paying for sign language interpreter in a nonpublic school setting does not violate the constitutional separation of church and state.  
🗑
Carter v. Florence County School District 4   (1993) Reimbursement for private school/ A court may order reimbursement to parents who withdraw their children from a public school that provides inappropriate education, even though the privat placement does not meet all IDEA requirements  
🗑
Doe v. Withers   (1993) FAPE/ Teachers are responsible for the implementation of accommodations specified in individual students’ IEPs  
🗑
Cedar Rapids School District b. Garret F   (1999) Related services/ Health attendants are related service and a district’s expense if the service is necessary to maintain the student in the educational programs.  
🗑
Schaffer v. Weast   (2005) the supreme court decided that the burden of proof in a Due process Hearing is on the party who files it  
🗑
Arlington Central School District v. Murphy   (2006) parents who win in a Due Process hearing are not entitled to recover expert witness fees having to do with the claims established in Due Process.  
🗑
Winkelman v. Parma City School district   (2007) parents, although not licensed attorneys may pursue IDEA claims on their own behalf. These rights are independent of their child’s rights.  
🗑
Forest Grove School District v. T.A.   (2009) IDEA allows reimbursement for private special education services, even when the child did not previously receive special education services from the public schools.  
🗑
Oberti v. Board of Education   (1993) continuum of special education services/ uphelt the educational rights to receive an education in their neighborhood school with adequate and necessary supports.  
🗑
Brown v. Board of Education   (1954) separate is not equal, states laws establishing separate public schools for black and white students unconstitutional, overturned Plessy v. Ferguson  
🗑
Larry P. v. Riles   (1979) established the legal precedent that tests administered to minority children must have been validated for use with that population. African American child who with having MR and fought that he was not tested fairly  
🗑
Lau v. Nichols   (1974) limited-English-proficient/guaranteed children an opportunity to a “meaningful education” regardless of their language background. a civil rights case that was brought by Chinese American students who had limited English proficiency  
🗑


   

Review the information in the table. When you are ready to quiz yourself you can hide individual columns or the entire table. Then you can click on the empty cells to reveal the answer. Try to recall what will be displayed before clicking the empty cell.
 
To hide a column, click on the column name.
 
To hide the entire table, click on the "Hide All" button.
 
You may also shuffle the rows of the table by clicking on the "Shuffle" button.
 
Or sort by any of the columns using the down arrow next to any column heading.
If you know all the data on any row, you can temporarily remove it by tapping the trash can to the right of the row.

 
Embed Code - If you would like this activity on your web page, copy the script below and paste it into your web page.

  Normal Size     Small Size show me how
Popular Law sets