| Question | Answer |
| What does 'Res Ipsa Loquitur' mean? | The thing speaks for itself |
| What is the first requirement of Res Ipsa Loquitur? | |
| Absence of explanation |
| What is the second requirement of Res Ipsa Loquitur? | Harm not expected with proper care |
| What is the third requirement of Res Ipsa Loquitur? | Exclusive control of D |
| Res Ipsa Loquitur is most commonly pleaded in? | Medical negligence cases |
| Case - Can be very difficult to prove C was unconscious at time | Mahon v Osbourne |
| Case - Special characteristics of a claimant (one eye) | Paris v Stepney |
| Case - What is the size of the risk? (unlikely cricket ball) | Bolton v Stone |
| Case - Have all practical precautions been taken? (Close wet factory) | Latimer v AEC Ltd |
| Case - What are the benefits of taking the risk? (Unsecure fireman jack) | Watts v Herts CC |
| Two-word test for factual causation | But-for test |
| What does 'Novus Actus Intervieniens' mean? | New intervening act |
| Factual Causation case - arsenic tea | Barnett v Chelsea |
| Two-word rule for Factual Causation | Thin skull rule |
| Factual Causation - there can be ____ causes | Multiple |
| Multiple Causes case - oxygen baby | Wilsher v Essex |
| If D is child/oap they owe a/an ___ standard of care than a RM | Lower |
| SoC age case - plastic ruler fights | Mullins v Richard |
| If D is trainee/learner they owe a/an ___ standard of care than a RM | Equal |
| SoC T/L case - learner driver | Nettleship v Weston |
| If D is professional they owe a/an ___ standard of care than a RM | Higher |
| SoC professional case - | |
| SoC professional case - low battery bleeper | Bolitho |
| If D is DIY they owe a/an ___ standard of care than a RM | equal |
| SoC DIY case - loose door handle | Wells v Cooper |
