Busy. Please wait.

Don't have an account? Sign up

taken

Age:

12 or younger
13 or older

Make sure to remember your password. If you forget it there is no way for StudyStack to send you a reset link. You would need to create a new account. Your email address is only used to allow you to reset your password. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Already a StudyStack user? Log In

Reset Password

Enter the email address associated with your account, and we'll email you a link to reset your password.

Upgrade to remove ads

CR Question Type ID

Embed Code - If you would like this activity on your web page, copy the script below and paste it into your web page.

Normal Size Small Size show me how

Created by: 9378260

Popular GMAT sets

Operations with Odd/Even Integers

1 - 10

SC-1

Question	Answer
Bolded font	R - Describe the Role
Responds to X by	DA - Describe the Argument
Assumption	FA - Find the Assumption "+" -> "C" \| Negation
Assume	FA - Find the Assumption "+" -> "C" \| Negation
Required for the conclusion to be more properly drawn...	FA - Find the Assumption "+" -> "C" \| Negation
Evaluate	EV - Evaluate the Argument "+" -> "C" \| 2 Paths Answer
Determine	EV - Evaluate the Argument "+" -> "C" \| 2 Paths Answer
Useful to know	EV - Evaluate the Argument "+" -> "C" \| 2 Paths Answer
Important to know	EV - Evaluate the Argument "+" -> "C" \| 2 Paths Answer
Challenges X by	DA - Describe the Argument
Strengthens + If True	ST - Strengthen the Argument Answer Supports Arg.
Supports + If True	ST - Strengthen the Argument Answer Supports Arg.
Weakens + If True	WK - Weaken the Argument Answer Weakens Arg.
Undermines + If True	WK - Weaken the Argument Answer Weakens Arg.
(Argument + Conclusion/Claim), since ____________.	CA - Complete the Argument Find a "+" to Support Given Claim
(Argument + Conclusion/Claim), because ____________.	CA - Complete the Argument Find a "+" to Support Given Claim
Flaw	FL - Flaw "+" -> "C"
Vulnerable to criticism	FL - Flaw "+" -> "C"
Explain	ED - Explain the Discrepancy "+" -> __why__ <- "+"
Resolve	ED - Explain the Discrepancy "+" -> __why__ <- "+"
If True	ST - Strengthen WK - Weaken
Conclude	INF - Inference Arg. Supports Answer
Infer	INF - Inference Arg. Supports Answer
Best supports	INF - Inference Arg. Supports Answer
Must be true	INF - Inference Arg. Supports Answer
Implies	INF - Inference Arg. Supports Answer
Which CR Types have NO CONCLUSION in Question?	ED - Explain the Discrepancy INF - Inference
(Dialogue)+ something is illustrated by _____________.	CA - Complete the Argument Need Concrete Ex. of a "+" from the Arg.
(Dialogue) + if some claim is true, it should be expected ______________.	CA - Complete the Argument Inference: Something that MUST BE TRUE given info in the argument
(Dialogue) + in order for some claim to be true, it must be shown ______________.	CA - Complete the Argument Inference: Something that MUST BE TRUE given info in the argument
Which of the following most logically completes the argument?	ST - Strengthen Answer Supports Arg.