Question | Answer |
BATTERY | IS THE INTENTIONAL HARMFUL OR OFFENSIVE TOUCHING OF ANOTHER WITHTOUT CONSENT OR PRIVILEGE |
ASSAULT | IS THE INTENTIONAL CREATION OF APPREHENSION OF OFFENSIVE OR HARMFUL TOUCHING IN ANOTHER WITHOUT CONSENT OR PRIVILEGE |
FALSE IMPRISONMENT | IS THE INTENTIONAL PHYSICAL OR PSYCHOLOGICAL CONFINEMENT OF ANOTHER WITHIN FIXED BOUNDARIES, FOR ANY PERIOD OF TIME, WITHOUT CONSENT OR PRIVILEGE. |
INTENTIONAL INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS | IS THE INTENTIONAL OUTRAGEOUS CONDUCT BY THE DEFENDANT WHICH IS CALCULATED TO CAUSE AND WHICH DOES CAUSE SEVERE EMOTIONAL DISTRESS. |
IS FEAR REQUIRED FOR ASSAULT | NO! APPREHENSION OF IMMINENT HARMFUL OR OFFENSIVE TOUCHING- FEAR IS NOT REQUIRED. |
FOR FALSE IMPRISONMENT DOES VICTIM NEED TO KNOW | YES!!! RESTRICITON TO A LIMITED AREA WITHOUT REASONABLE MEANS OF ESCAPE- VICTIM MYST BE AWARE OF CONFINEMENT WHILE CONFINED. |
TRESSPASS TO LAND | IS THE INTENTIONAL INTERFERENCE WITH PERSONAL PROPERTY OF ANOTHER WITHOUT CONSENT OR PRIVILEGE. |
TRESSPASS TO CHATTLES | IS THE INTENTIONAL INTERFERENCE WITH PERSONAL PROPERTY OF ANOTHER WITHOUT CONSENT OR PRIVILEGE. |
CONVERSION | IS THE INTENTIONAL EXERCISE OF DOMINION AND CONTROL OVER THE PERSONAL PROPERTY OF ANOTHER WITHOUT CONSENT OR PRIVILEGE. |
WHAT IS THE INTENT OF TRESSPASS TO LAND | INTENT TO DO THE ACT THAT CAUSE INTRUSION OF PLAINTIFFS LAND |
WHAT IS THE INTENT OF TRESSPASS TO CHATTLES | INTENT TO DEAL WITH THE CHATTEL INT HE MANNER IN WHICH IT DEALT |
WHAT IS THE INTENT OF CONVERSION | INTENT TO DEAL WITH THE CHATTEL IN THE MANNER IN WHICH IT WAS DEALT |
RESPONDENT SUPERIOR | AN EMPLOYER IS LIABLE FOR THE ACTS OF ITS EMPLOYEES WHILE IN THE COURSE AND SCOPE OF THEIR EMPLOYMENT |
DUTY | IS OWED TO EXERCISE DUE CARE NOT TO SUBJECT OTHERS TO A FORESEEABLE RISK OF PHYSICAL INJURY THAT MIGHT FORESEEABLY CAUSE EMOTIONAL DISTRESS |