Help
Options
Didn't know it?
click below
click below
Knew it?
click below
click below
Don't Know
Remaining cards (0)
Know
retry
shuffle
restart
0:00
Embed Code - If you would like this activity on your web page, copy the script below and paste it into your web page.
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Case Laws
Special Education laws
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| Brown Vs. Board of Education (1954) | Civil rights action not directly involved with special education |
| Parc Vs. Pennsylvania (1971) | 12 yr old transfered, due process procedures, first education law for students with disabilities |
| Mills Vs. DC Board of Education (1972) | right to a hearing, right to appeal, right to have access to records, expanded procedural due process rights, foundation for 94-142 |
| Vocational Rehabilitation (Section 504) 1973 | Prevents discrimination against individuals with disabilities. Defined disability in part as one perceived as having disability |
| PL 94-142 (EAHCA) 1975 | Education of Handicapped Children Act, first education law for students with disabilities, built on foundations of parc and mills |
| Special ed | support of general ed teacher |
| nurse | gathers medical history of students |
| interpeter | deaf, hard of hearing |
| speech language pathologist | works with speech and talking |
| occupational therapist | fine motor skills |
| physical therapist | gross motor skills |
| psychologist | gives out test scores and looks at them |
| teacher aide/paraprofessional | can't teach new concepts...helps teacher |
| LRE (Daniel RR Vs. Texas state board of education | First prong test-placement in gen ed is satisfactory (accommodations, aides, services, impact on students) 2nd prong test- removal from gen ed-maximum extent peer interactions |
| Peer Interactions (Espino Vs. Besteiro) | importance of interactions with non-disabled and maximize social skills |
| Evaluation (Larry P. Vs. Riles) | Testing did racially discriminate |
| Appropriate (Board of Education Vs. Rowley) | Rowley standard...intent of act-special ed instruction and related services which are designed to provide educational benefits |
| Zero Reject (Timothy Vs. Rochester School) | received no services for 3 1/2 years, after 4 yrs, child must be able to benefit |
| 6 Basic principles | 1-parent and student involvement 2- Procedural due process 3- LRE 4- Appropriate education (fape) 5- non discriminatory evaluation 6- Zero Reject |
| IDEA 2004 | 15 states to pilot 3 yr program, highly qualified special ed teachers |
| PL 105 -17 IDEA 1997 | General ed teacher...required a team member |
| IDEA 1990 | Individuals with disabilities education act...People first language and replaced handicapped with the term disability |
| PL 101-336 ADA 1990 | American with disability act..Access and accommodations |
| PL 94-457 (1986) | mandated services for eligible children 3-5 |
| Part B | 3-21 yrs.. |
| Part C | birth-2 yrs...not required |
| 3 civil laws | Brown vs. board, ADA, 504 |
| 2 Reasons for eligibilty for special ed services | demonstrate a need and have one of the 13 disabilities from IDEA |
Created by:
lindse22
Popular Miscellaneous sets