click below
click below
Normal Size Small Size show me how
psy400ch9p205-
CHAPTER 9 VARIATIONS ON EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNS
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| Single-case experimental design | experimental methodology (c.g., implementing experimental and control conditions) is applied to a single subject. |
| Two key characteristics ensure a single case experimental design | manipulate an independent with a dependent variable response; individual subject actually serves as his or her own control |
| Reversal design ( orABA design): single-case experimental design in which baseline measurements are initially taken (A), | an intervention is implemented and measurements are taken (B), and finally the intervention is removed and measurements are taken one last time (A). |
| ABA design | baseiine-intervention-baseline |
| the final A of the ABA design serves as | a placebo group in a traditional experimental design |
| If the behavior of interest differs in the final A condition from the initial A condition it may suggest that | there is some carryover effect from the intervention |
| ABAB design: single-case experimental design involving a baseline measurement (A), an intervention measurement (B), | a measurement following removal of the intervention (A), and finally a second intervention measurement (B). |
| Multiple baseline design: uses a varying time schedule to help determine whether the treatment itself is actually leading to the change (as opposed to just the passage of time). | measurements are made at baseline, then after an intervention and again when the intervention is completed or the treatment withdrawn (return to baseline). |
| A multiple baseline design systematically looks | at the timing and dosage of the intervention |
| Advantages of Single-case Experimental Designs | only one individual, replicating enhances validity, experimental control |
| The single case also may refer to | an individual, a group, or organization depending on the research question, establishing preliminary efficacy |
| Disadvantages of Single-case Experimental Designs | difficult to draw any conclusions about a larger population, multiple observations and exposures to the intervention itself may affect the responses, ethical challenges |
| QUASI-EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNS | includes some elements of experimental control without being a true experiment |
| Advantages of Quasi-experimental Designs | flexibility (set up their methods and in the topics: take advantage of naturally occurring groups), standardize treatment |
| Disadvantages of Quasi-experimental Designs | not as much clarity about cause-and-effect relations as full experimental designs; somewhat like correlational study |
| FACTORIAL DESIGN | An experimental design that has more than one independent variable. |
| Factor | A variable manipulated by the experimenter |
| factorial approach benefits | effect of IV combinations; examine the complexity of the real world; better external validity |
| 2 x 2 factorial design | examines two factors |
| 2 x 2 x 2 design | examines three factors |
| Levels: The values taken on by an independent variable or factor. | For example, in a drug effectiveness study, you may have a factor of "treatment,” which has levels of "placebo" and "drug" |
| In the 2 x 2 design, we would refer to the first factor (therapeutic style) as factor A | and to the second factor (openness to therapy) as factor B. |
| Cell | A combination of one level from each factor in the experiment |
| The number of cells in a factorial design equals | the number of levels of the different factors multiplied by each other |
| For example, a 2 x 2 design would have 4 cells, | whereas a 3 x 4 design would have 12 cells |
| Each condition (often referred to as a cell) represents a unique | combination of the levels of the independent variables. |